Javvy

I personally agree with the vision and the idea is good, but there are too many competitor. There are thousands of wallet at AppStore. User more concern about the security, safety and sustainability while select a wallet.

So, the core team has to find own strength and unique. Proof this is the right choice for user.

No big influencer in the core team. The project have to find as many big influence to endorse the project as possible.

While the wallet application already published, I think Softcap can define as zero because the first version of product is ready.

The idea for the product is ok, but it is a very busy market with a lot of alternatives available already for consumers. The team is fairly solid, but could be stronger in numbers.

Overall Experienced Team I basically like the Vision. This project have real usecase. Already releases their Product. they are also Self Funded. Team is really working hard. Hardcap and Softcap very reasonable. Best of Luck guys.

Interesting project. Seems to be a very grassroots approach, which doesn't work like it may have a year ago. With the current market conditions, I worry about how successful this project will be. I will keep an eye on this one. Best of luck to the team!

Very interesting product, I like it a lot. There are many similar players in the scene offering similar product, so it will be a tough competitive market. Good luck team!

White paper - The white paper is simple, yet clearly states everything in details in terms of process overview but lacks specifics in terms of financials. It consists of enough details for investors to make an informed decision.

Team - The team composition and advisory is a bit on the smaller side but capable. The only drawback being the utilization of mostly freelancers for the platform development and including them in team profile. This could seriously come back and haunt the team post-production if there is any issues pertaining to the DApp.

Tokenomics - Their tokenomics as well as funds deployment is quite reasonable. Although a better way could have been to show a min, optimum and maximum spending based on soft cap and hard cap range (since soft cap and hard cap varies quite a bit).

Business Model - The business model lacks clarity as to how the DApp would earn money. The business idea is to earn money from service fee, KYC accreditation fee, etc but not how much could be the profit based on customer acquisition. This would greatly enhance the white paper as investors could be able to make a guess about their ROI.

MVP/ DApp/ Working Product  - They have a working MVP.

A credible project with a strong team.

However this is an ambitious project and should start with adoption arrangement with a number of exchanges and gradual community building.

Token economy is decent though price of tokens can be raised while reducing number of tokens in circulation.

At current situation, when whole the crypto-market falled down, the best way to reanimate it is make something special and useful for mass-adoption. This project has started to do it and make huge efforts for making whole crypto currencies being accesible to all of us in simple way through one wallet. I cross my fingers and encourage the team for great success.

I like that the project is backed up with a credible team who believe in the vision of the project. With Javvy, users do not need to have different exchange accounts as it acts as a universal wallet integrates easily with different top exchanges in the crypto market. This idea seems like a very solid one, although I envision different setbacks for Javvy, it looks like it has a staying power.

This wallet runs on the Ethereum platform, and it accepts only ETH. 1 JVY goes for 0.0004ETH. There are 100,000,000 Javvy tokens for sale, and a token goes for 0.0857 USD. The price of the token is good enough considering the fact that it is new to the market.

JVY’s soft cap and hard cap are 1000 ETH and 8,000,000 USD respectively which is quite reasonable. The best part is that the team is also self-funded. The financial information, especially the soft cap and the hard cap look reasonable.

Ambitious project, not very original that tries to land in a very difficult market, already full of competitors, many of them already very rich, influential and well-functioning.

The team is quite large and has figures that cover all the necessary positions in a company like theirs, but it lacks a bit more of Blockchain & Financial in the organic. Some of them have very little experience behind.

Social and communication channels a bit fluctuating, on some platforms you have a good community while on others almost non-existent, very little activity on the blog, which is a very important channel for updates and to keep the community informed.

The distribution of the token is very unbalanced, there are 75% of tokens to the sale, while there is no "reserve fund", a "partnerships", a "bounty" or "airdrop". Very synthetic whitepaper, a couple of promises, a small analysis of the competitors, a couple of problems and a couple of solutions. There are no tokenomics, while the business plan is unclear and incomplete. The very synthetic MVP app, too, but it's there anyway.

There is no activity on github, if not for 2 repositories, one with the token ticker and the other with ICO details, but other updates or developments are not present. Remember that github is the mirror of your project and of the product that you would like to launch on the market and not to present anything there, to ICO almost finished, does not create a very positive impression among the experts.

I liked the idea very much, Personally I was looking for something like this, I think this will be having a real user base and the reasons are below -

Every exchange has some kind of unique feature and it is difficult to manage all the exchange
Having one account will also insure that you need to look for one wallet address only.

I wishes best of luck to this team.

Team is small if we consider Advisors but the core team members seems capable of their skills , the only thing worries is the time the crypto market changed drastically in last year thus surviving in current market with this features won't be easy.

overall project is good, team is good and vision too looks good just need dedicated hard work.

Their team has passed the KYC, but the numbers are too small: 10 team members and 2 advisors are just not enough. Unless you plan to outsource, but in that case, you should mention it.

They have MVP available for Windows, Android, iOS, OS X and Linux. This is a huge plus.

Javvy has nothing new to offer. This market is now flooded with wallets but most common problems like mitigating difficulty in using public keys by commoners, have not been addressed till date. I cannot see any appealing features in product. Prototype doesn't seems appealing to me. The big question is, why on earth a wallet needs USD 8 million for development and doing business at first place? Secondly, Whitepaper is flawed. so comprehensive roadmap and numerous claims. The info provided doesn't serve the purpose but simply confuse in regard to vision of company. ICO/STO support, POS/POW Miners,International Debit card, crypto exchange....? Are you guys sure of achieving same with so much ability in current and near future markets? I am quite doubtful about same. The "SEC compliance" paragraph is literally a disclaimer and nothing being offered in name of compliance. I cannot see any business model, financial projection and just stories quoting other businesses everywhere in Whitepaper. Would love to understand more about patent you have filed with proper information.

Overall, I would recommend to avoid any investment in this project since it needs a lot of clarity on different aspects.

Not a new concept, there are already many in the Market with similar functionalities.

Team is good but have limited advisors, hardcap and token price looks good

simple and fast process for user registration and verification, Javvy brings confidence and clarity to the user as cryptocurrencies approach mass adoptio

I seem not to be the first expert giving a rating to this project. Benchy gave a 4.8 and after taking a closer look, I understand why. Their team passed the KYC, the project looks good and I liked their concept.
Their idea looks pretty good and their vision seems strong enough to make a difference.
However, the product is not very innovative, and they need more advisors.

Good luck Team!