HighVibe.Network

There have been so many projects of this kind (a few are quite successful). Is the team aware of it?! No competitive analysis found. The first 65 pages of the whitepaper dont have almost any numbers except for general markets volumes. No business planning and financials. Thoght the team looks quite experienced and is numerous. I am sure they need more ico advisors and the WP should be largely improved and adapted.

Team is good but advisors are too thin. Need to be improved.

WP is well written and longer than any other WPs I have ever gone through which is good. However, the most interesting part Market Analysis is not well prepared. It just provides generalized information without any concrete data to support your concept. Remember that investors are now more educated so they will invest in the project with reliable data and analysis. This part must be improved as it is the core of the WP.

Good thing is the MVP is available but it seems not a fully operational product that I can understand. Hope to see more improved version soon.

Good luck to the project!

Team members are in very good condition.
The products are very good and diversity is developing.
I think that this project focuses not only on utilizing block chains, but on the point of seeking peace of mind of people using it.

I just don't get what they are trying to achieve differently that all the other platforms doing the same thing. It's not a new concept and a few companies are doing it successfully already. Team is definitely good and experienced but the WP leaves a lot to be desired. No numbers, business planning or financials.

There are plenty of projects out there who employ similar concepts. I believe that the team should do a competitive market analysis.

The Whitepaper does not provide the necessary information which would attract potential investors or creators to the platform. I still think that they can make it, but it would require plenty of work on their part.

Cool idea to pay people for learning, improving, meditating, etc. However, the idea of paying for learning was already adopted by Bitdegree for example. Anyway, still nice to see such applications. Positive +

Product/demand => I am not sure whether there is a demand for such a product. I would like to see some examples of analysis such as user persona, JTBD, etc. I think this might be a weak point of the product. Neutral +/-

Strong and experienced team. It is weird to see a team stronger than advisors :) Positive +

Good hype with 20k on telegram and 9k on twitter. Positive +

Token allocation is not very good for investors. They are allocating only 50% of the tokens to the public. At least it is good to have a hard cap but I don't think $28m is necessary for such project. Negative -

Good use case for the Blockchain Technology. This kind of projects need a large user base to be successful. The teams seems to have the necessary marketing background and skills that are needed for this, but I couldn't find a detailed marketing roadmap in the Whitepaper.

The Tokenomics are outlined in detail, but I could not find the information about what happens to unsold tokens. Also its not clear whether the described private sale already happened or if it is just planned.

All the elements and pieces are in place for this project to be successful. Solid leadership. Well developed relationships. Great visionaries. I think this one does a lot of good.

I felt it was a challenge to an unknown area as if it were a setting in SF movies.
I think that ICO should be for challenges to such new things.
Recently I've only seen boring ICOs, but this project is very interesting.
──────────────
まるでSF映画の中の設定であるかのような未知の領域へのチャレンジだと感じました。
ICOはこのような新しいことへの挑戦の為にあるべきだと考えます。
最近つまらないICOばかりを見てきましたが、このプロジェクトは非常に興味深いです。

The mission stated on WP is not clear and understandable. It is hard to understand why the vision is great. The mission is the most important part of project. People invest in based on it.
Products are great and they clearly tackle the current problems we have. In this case, blockchain technology is best solution for solving the problems and they understand this.
The team members have a lot of experiences and credible.

Team is decent but advisory board is meh. I don't see them doing anything really much different from other competitors. The white-paper seems to be a bit overwhelming and doesn't really catch my interest. I personally don't see this project taking off again this is just my opinion and I could be wrong.

The project is looking to be a quasi one stop shop for wellbeing that also provides incentives. There is some uniqueness however high competition exists in the wellbeing / gamification space. No financial or competitor analysis.

I tested the alpha, whilst user friendly, I worry that there is too much happening and more focus should be on a specific offering until adoption comes to fruition.

An experienced / extensive team but advisors are weak for the vision.