Some of the links on this site may be affiliate links. ICOBench may receive advertising commissions when users visit recommended platforms via our affiliate links, at no additional cost to you. All recommendations are based on a comprehensive review process. 
The Senate’s failed cloture vote on Tuesday 15 September did not kill the CLARITY Act, but it delivered a blunt verdict: the House-originated crypto market-structure framework could not attract the 60 votes needed to advance. That failure reframes the entire fight.
The next version of the bill will not be a simple House reintroduction: it will be a Senate-built compromise, and the open question is who gets to hold the pen.
Democrats demanded a government study on crypto mixers and tumblers, the tools criminals use to launder digital assets. The Clarity Act mandates it.
Democrats voted no on protecting consumers.
— Senator Cynthia Lummis (@SenLummis) September 27, 2026
Senate Cloture Failure Puts the CLARITY Rewrite in Play
H.R. 3633, the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, passed the House back on 17 July 2025. Its path through the Senate has been anything but simple, and the 15 September cloture vote made that plain: the bill fell short of the 60-vote threshold required to proceed, a procedural failure rather than a formal rejection of its substance.
As an earlier breakdown of the failed 60-vote attempt laid out, the vote leaves the legislation alive but stalled, and the real contest now shifts to who assembles a version capable of clearing the Senate.
Trade Securely With 0% Trading Fees on BinanceWhat the Lummis Draft Actually Changes
One day before that vote, Senator Cynthia Lummis published updated substitute text for H.R. 3633 on her office’s website. This draft fuses the House-passed bill with amendments the Senate Banking Committee reported on 1 June 2026 and provisions from S. 3755, as reported by the Senate Agriculture Committee on 2 February 2026.
According to the Congressional Research Service’s overview of the text, the draft would hand the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over cash or spot-market sales of digital commodities. The SEC would retain authority over certain primary-market sales of what the bill calls “ancillary assets,” subject to a new, limited registration exemption under a proposed rule package called Regulation Crypto.
The draft goes further than jurisdictional lines. It outlines anti-money-laundering duties for digital commodity brokers, dealers, and exchanges under the Bank Secrecy Act, while exempting decentralised finance operators who lack control over transactions. It also covers registration for digital-asset kiosks and clarifies which digital-asset activities banks may conduct within ordinary banking operations. As how regulators might act while Congress negotiates makes clear, the SEC-CFTC divide at the heart of this text is exactly the kind of structural question that doesn’t resolve itself just because a cloture vote fails. It has to be renegotiated.
Don’t Miss: ICOBench Experts Call the Next 1000x Crypto Coins for 2027
CLARITY Act: Who Has Leverage Over the Rewrite?
The Lummis substitute already shows its authorship: it is stitched together from Senate Banking Committee and Senate Agriculture Committee work product, not a House rewrite. That alone signals where leverage sits going forward. Because the bill failed to secure 60 votes in its current form, it must gain support beyond its original coalition. This shift gives Banking Committee leadership, Agriculture Committee stakeholders, and senators from both sides who declined to move forward a say in the next steps.
The substantive fault lines are visible in the text itself: how tightly the SEC’s Regulation Crypto exemption is drawn, how the CFTC’s core-principles framework treats digital commodity exchanges, and how the bill’s decentralized-finance carve-outs are defined. That last point is especially contentious. The bill outlines a control-based DeFi compliance, detailed in the bill’s control-based approach to DeFi. It determines which protocols escape securities and commodities registration entirely versus which face SEC rulemaking on liquidity-pool participation. Expect that provision to be a central battleground in any Senate-compatible rewrite.
What Comes Next for CLARITY Act 2.0
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 White House crypto advisor Patrick Witt says the SEC and CFTC will deliver crypto regulation.
“We’re full steam ahead.”
WITH OR WITHOUT CONGRESS, CLARITY IS COMING! 🚀 pic.twitter.com/qPPThwbg36
— Crypto Rover (@cryptorover) September 27, 2026
Nothing in the record so far sets a date for a renewed cloture attempt or commits any chamber to a specific rewrite process. What’s established is narrower but still significant: a comprehensive crypto regulation framework built around dividing SEC and CFTC authority now needs a coalition it didn’t have on 15 September, and that coalition will most plausibly be built through further Senate Banking Committee negotiation rather than a fresh House vote.
The jurisdictional lines drawn in the Lummis draft (CFTC control of spot digital-commodity markets, SEC oversight of ancillary-asset primary sales) represent the current baseline for any future framework. This holds true even if the specific ethics, stablecoin-yield, and DeFi provisions are renegotiated before a bill returns to the floor.
Don’t Miss: Best Crypto Presales This Quarter
