Crypto Holders Hit by Surge in Violent Attacks as Physical Threats Double in 2025

Cryptocurrencies are considered a high-risk asset class. Investing in them may result in the loss of part or all of your capital. The content on this website is intended solely for informational and educational use and should not be interpreted as financial or investment advice.
Why Trust Us
Why Trust Us
Crypto Holders Hit by Surge in Violent Attacks

A surge in violent, real-world attacks targeting cryptocurrency holders is raising alarm across the industry, according to new data released by Jameson Lopp, a prominent security executive.

Lopp, who maintains a long-running database tracking physical attacks aimed at stealing private keys or wallet credentials, reports that such incidents have skyrocketed in 2025.

In 2023, only 18 cases were reported worldwide. That number rose to 24 in 2024. But by the middle of 2025, more than 50 physical attacks had already been recorded, which is more than double the total from the previous year.

Blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis has confirmed the trend, with some analyses showing a 169% year-over-year increase. What used to occur only several times per year is now being documented on a weekly basis.

Violence Intensifies as Criminal Tactics Evolve

The severity of the attacks is also escalating. In January 2025, David Balland, co-founder of hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger, was kidnapped in France. During the ransom attempt, attackers severed one of his fingers in an effort to force access to his wallet.

In March, popular streamer Amouranth was targeted by an armed home invasion just hours after publicly revealing she held about USD 20 million worth of Bitcoin.

Another high-profile incident in San Francisco involved criminals posing as delivery workers who restrained a victim and stole approximately USD 11 million in crypto assets. The attackers had previously identified the victim’s holdings and home address, enabled in part by blockchain transparency and leaked personal information.

Challenges to the “Self-Custody” Principle

For years, the crypto community has championed the mantra “Not your keys, not your coins,” encouraging users to self-custody their assets rather than rely on centralized exchanges.

But self-custody introduces a critical weakness: if the owner is physically coerced, the entire balance can be stolen instantly. Even cold wallets designed for offline protection cannot defend against threats to the owner’s safety.

This creates a dangerous single point of failure that criminals are increasingly exploiting.

As a result, some users are adopting countermeasures such as “panic wallets”, decoy wallets containing small amounts of crypto to satisfy attackers, or exploring insurance products that cover physical theft.

The crypto community now faces a difficult question: Is the sovereignty offered by self-custody worth the rising threat of physical violence?

Experts say the only sustainable approach is improving education, adopting robust safety practices, and understanding the full spectrum of risks associated with holding substantial crypto assets.

 

By Patrick Johnson

Patrick Johnson is a seasoned crypto journalist and analyst with a sharp eye for emerging trends in blockchain, DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 innovation. With a background in tech writing and years of experience tracking digital assets, Patrick breaks down complex topics into clear, actionable insights for investors, builders, and curious readers alike. His work spans market analysis, crypto regulation, decentralized finance ecosystems, and interviews with founders shaping the next phase of the internet. Patrick's writing has appeared in leading crypto publications and has earned a reputation for depth, clarity, and a no-hype approach to crypto journalism. When he’s not decoding the latest protocol upgrade or reporting on DAO governance shifts, you’ll find him experimenting with smart contracts or hiking off-grid, because even crypto authors need to unplug sometimes.