DreamTeam

Some of team members are from another success ICO project. Team is strong.

Team is good .. Adding some good advisor so I am updating my rating

The team is too localised. The advisor panel is good! I dont see beneficial usage of blockchain here

Strong team! Interesting concept and idea.
Working MVP ++++


Don't find it necessary to implement specific tokens into this system. Why not to use already existed blockchains?

I updated my rating after doing some more DD and what the team have achieved recently is pretty impressive.

Received investment from Mangrove Capital Partners and the the first investment in the history of Mangrove (http://www.mangrove.vc) in esports and ICO.

Platform reached 450K active users with over 70K newly created esports teams in CS:GO. On April 16 adding the League of Legends – game with over 150M monthly players.

Successfully implemented blockchain via smart contracts for player salaries payouts. Currently working on the Ethereum test network, and after the distribution of DreamTeam Tokens will be converted to the real-value blockchain network.

Real business advisors and not name plates, including the CEO of ESL, VP of Blizzard, CGO of fnatic and others. New partners - leaders in the esports industry (SK Gaming, ESL, NaVi, Starladder), as well as financial and crypto-currency market (Xsolla, BadWater Capital).

Has very good potential and have shown they can execute

++ Solid core team and advisory board with proven experience in gaming and ICO world
++ Already raised capital from one of the VCs
++ Already have a working platform with 400K+ players
+- Existing competition from the established ICOs
-- Vague business plan and vague logic behind having another token
-- Why another ICO when team has already done 1 successful ICO before? What happens to the other project? Will they do one more ICO and leave this project high and dry?

Pluses:

- Team has been working in this business for many years
- The team conducted a successful ICO
- Esports market is really very promising, and platform Dream Team can occupy this niche
- There is a working product (MVP) - which does not use blockchain

Minuses:

- Team recently conducted another ICO and again does the following, it looks at least strange. (It is because of this that my estimate is 3)
- The code on the githab contains only the token contract that is imported from the zeppelin library, plus one additional function for the multitransfer. There are no more contracts
- Whie paper is written as a template investment presentation for the venture market, it's not a White paper.
- There is no specifics in the WP, it is absolutely not clear how this will all work
- If you remove the token from the system and replace it with eth - nothing will change, everything will work

p.s: Product was evaluated precisely from the point of view of the blockchain.

+ expertise in the field
+ marketing approach & vision
+ team conducted successful ICO

- real monetization of the idea
- general token contract
- removing token from the idea, replace it with something else (ETH), it will still work
- white paper not a true whitepaper
- no specifications how it will exactly work