DreamTeam

Some of team members are from another success ICO project. Team is strong.

A very good and exciting idea, which is already backed up by a working platform and some good statistics. A very strong team at the helm backed up by good advisors as well

Team is good .. Adding some good advisor so I am updating my rating

I updated my rating after doing some more DD and what the team have achieved recently is pretty impressive.

Received investment from Mangrove Capital Partners and the the first investment in the history of Mangrove (http://www.mangrove.vc) in esports and ICO.

Platform reached 450K active users with over 70K newly created esports teams in CS:GO. On April 16 adding the League of Legends – game with over 150M monthly players.

Successfully implemented blockchain via smart contracts for player salaries payouts. Currently working on the Ethereum test network, and after the distribution of DreamTeam Tokens will be converted to the real-value blockchain network.

Real business advisors and not name plates, including the CEO of ESL, VP of Blizzard, CGO of fnatic and others. New partners - leaders in the esports industry (SK Gaming, ESL, NaVi, Starladder), as well as financial and crypto-currency market (Xsolla, BadWater Capital).

Has very good potential and have shown they can execute

The presence of beta version is of great importance for the development of any project. Hard Cap was reached during the first phase of Token Sale. This is a good indicator. I think the team will succeed.

Esports is a big area, smart play on it.

Strong team! Interesting concept and idea.
Working MVP ++++


Don't find it necessary to implement specific tokens into this system. Why not to use already existed blockchains?

Pluses:

- Team has been working in this business for many years
- The team conducted a successful ICO
- Esports market is really very promising, and platform Dream Team can occupy this niche
- There is a working product (MVP) - which does not use blockchain

Minuses:

- Team recently conducted another ICO and again does the following, it looks at least strange. (It is because of this that my estimate is 3)
- The code on the githab contains only the token contract that is imported from the zeppelin library, plus one additional function for the multitransfer. There are no more contracts
- Whie paper is written as a template investment presentation for the venture market, it's not a White paper.
- There is no specifics in the WP, it is absolutely not clear how this will all work
- If you remove the token from the system and replace it with eth - nothing will change, everything will work

p.s: Product was evaluated precisely from the point of view of the blockchain.

That looks really professional. Nice project!

Update: based on new information provided by the team including people involved with the project, adoption, and investments made the project has progressed well

Good product with a strong team.

Lets say team have good idea, But how to make it at Blockchain service? What Are the Benefits of Businesses for the idea? Need keep development.

+ expertise in the field
+ marketing approach & vision
+ team conducted successful ICO

- real monetization of the idea
- general token contract
- removing token from the idea, replace it with something else (ETH), it will still work
- white paper not a true whitepaper
- no specifications how it will exactly work