Ratings Universal Protocol

While BTC and Ethereum will be losing their supremacy, finding ways to create paths between various blockchain will be a real must have, so Universal Protocol is going to be well positioned. Opening their interoperability to other assets later will give it even more utility.
Giving tools to add some human-proof security is a real mandatory too (loss of password, death), even more in a B2B use.
=> Real use cases, with real and detailed technical solutions.

Big names in the Alliance: Bittrex, Brave, Cred, Blockchain at Berkeley… which is great and reinsuring in the quality of the project.

Token used like BNB: reduced fees, voting right and some access to service. May then be used a lot but with a high velocity.
No burning like BNB. So unsure how the price may react.

Extensive Whitepaper.
But no MVP while the project is launch from months.

The team seems of quality, experienced and big enough for such a project.

Public sale is 300k tokens while there are more than 10 000k tokens in supply. So public buyers will be very very small comparing to the total supply (only 3%).
There is no information on the conditions of the former private sale (600k tokens sold) and on the future sales (when, why, how much...).
54% of the tokens are held by the alliance members, that’s huge and could be a red flag in many other ICO. Maybe it's just to keep the voting right (which would then be very centralized) but it's a big concern.
=> Waiting answers about these tokenomics, which explains the current "2" on the product grade.