SNBL

this apears to be nothing more than recognizable crypto related terminology mixed with nonsense and false promises. This will be a really bad investment.

The project target on a high challenge market but lack of more proof document to convince investor.

Since there are hundred crypto currencies already deployed, why snowball? It’s the major key successful factor which need more discovery.

All discriptions are pretty general. It is looks like bitconect or new pyramin. Only general words about value, new crypto, without current vision of implementing and launching of the project

"The snowball project will distribute this new crypto currency all over the world and raise its value hundreds of times. "

Okay, this is just stiupid. What a mess. The whole thing is just one great big bad idea with no focus, no structure, nothing but a promise that we will all get rich if we buy it. Right...

This project makes no sense to me,there it totally no need for this kind of concepts and value-making strategies in the cryptospace. hey want to make the currency usable for practically everything, would stay away from this one!!!!

Seems to be misleading investors and making promises that are unreasonable and unethical. Also, there is several things such as the grammar and the short outlook on milestones which makes this a weak project.

Lots of red flags here. 0% of the group have linkedin pages posted. The explainer video explains nothing about the project just gives a lot of multi level marketing type dream hype.

The whitepaper is actually written well and describes the concept well, but there are too many other projects out there to take a risk with this one.

This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.

Misleading and unprofessional are two red flags which made me give low marks for this project. Making money out of money for no other aligned profit does not bring in the needed ROI for investors - so where will the growth come from? The short term outlook on milestones additionally makes me think this a project will run short of its promises..

This just doesn't look like a professional offering. I'm very cautious to give bad ratings on ico bench but this one I had to..

The vision, the team, the grammar etc.

This needs some brand work and also at the moment just looks a little sketchy to me.

hope to be proven wrong

Unfortunately after reviewing twice I still had to rate this project the way I did. The team, vision and product speak for itself, from the very basic - grammar mistakes throughout, promises to investors alone raises red flags, etc. (many more). Wishing you all the best of luck in future ventures.

The business model seems very vague in the sense it boasts about raising the token value 100 times, but i suggest the team to have multiple iteration to come up with something concrete.

1. Quite a few issues with this project.

2. I may revise my ratings after team has responded to all the comments by the other reviewers who have rated this project 1 1 1.

What is the need for this project.
There are so many currency already out there and each one has it own value.
This is just another coin and SNBL said they will raise the value of the coin. Which is not possible.

This project is a joke and a clear example of how desperate they are to do an ico when they dont even know the basic parameters to do a successful ico.

" It will a crypto currency that can be used for all kinds of entertainment." Seems like they do not even know what their ICO is about. I see a lot of Red Flags, no investment recommendation.

Since when to list a token on Etherdelta must appear on the WP and be sold as a product? I've never seen this, it's a shame for all.
Stay away from this project

I thought the premium with star would be a great product to give ratings but it seems this one is not a good one though.

Weak team with a lot of grammatical mistakes both in description and the whitepaper. Really wanted to give a higher rating but I could not. Hope the team will improve soon and am willing to adjust my ratings.

Team : 2 members have done there verification hence giving 2. Other member don't have social media presence.

Vision : Vision isnt great and also whitepaper doent look good.

product : No prototype with poor team hence doubt about product

I really don't understand what product they are offering. Hate to give a low rating but have to. Needs much work as it looks sketchy to me. At least the founders can get their KYC done, which is a basic step.

I think they should better position their product.