Rated on Apr 13, 2018
Looking forward to your project's progress.
Rated on May 20, 2018
I understand why the team may see that there is an opportunity here, but think that there are many pools in place to date that do this using permablock or other solutions. I think they may struggle with deal flow. The current permablock solutions work well for pools and not sure what the need is for 10m or so which is a large amount. Doing it like this may also look like a collective investment scheme and that needs a lot of legal work . Not sure if the team or advisosr have the specia
list knowledge needed for this type of product
I do not want to talk about the merits, the faults and the differences between the competitor you mentioned and Jointly, I just say that if we wanted to do the same things of primalblock we would not have created the jointly project, on WP some differences between us and the competitors are explained.
a hard-cap of € 10 million has been decided for marketing (making the platform known as much as possible) and implementing more functions on the platform in the shortest possible time, Jointly will be very user friendly.
finally, we are talking to various lawyers to respect all laws.
Rated on May 3, 2018
Good team, need to work on website to attract audience and convey concept.
On the website we are working to revolutionize it, in fact in this period will turn out sometimes offline.
Rated on May 7, 2018
As more and more smaller investors get squeezed out seeing the institutional investors are starting to clean up in presales, this is a good idea - which will allow the average investor to get rewards usually only given to the upper investor class. Shame we are moving this way in a sense as innovation investment should be open and fair to all... but alas, the real world and Wall St is coming and this is the only way for small guys to play.
we noticed that you understood the concept behind the project, we will be happy to keep you updated.
Rated on Apr 30, 2018
Rated on Mar 7, 2018
Not professionally presented. ICO is lacking key advisors and notable personalities. The website is sub-grade. Idea is not novel and in my own opinion, I find this a very amateur project. It needs a lot more to be taken seriously.
Rated on May 19, 2018
Startups probably should be created by young people, but not this kind. This is an investment pooling project, and credentials of the team are key. Many aspects of the product should be done differently, product like this should have very strict focus and leave the rest to the community. Good luck, youngsters!
It's a new service that can benefit a lot of investors, I would use it!
We are young but I don't see why it can not be done for this reason.
Thanks for the vote and best regards
Rated on May 1, 2018
Good team and advisors, interesting idea to leverage blockchain technology. Good luck!
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.