DateCoin

Concept is good, however; the marketing to create community adoption alone would cost 3 times than what they expect to recieve in ico. There will be intensive marketing required for this to be successful.

The main advantage of the project is surely that it already has over +700k users, working product and 5y of experience with strong team which will positively affect long-term stability of the company. Besides, solid media coverage and community support can ensure project’s short-term potential.

A particularly interesting concept led by a good team, looking forward to seeing how this goes

$ 11.9 ARPU in dating is very cool!

Great team .... already have product ... Vision is good too

Interesting

Team good
On vision, what are the social implications of paying people to date? Escort?
Concept a 3, beta 4, alpha 5. I may have missed the beta, but will upgrade as needed.

Team looks very string but maybe would look to see some more affiliate experience as will the volumes they may get there are many sub sites to be run. Is this more of a compensated dating app and if so then they may have legal issues in some parts of the world. There may be a stigma to holding this coin in your wallet if it is seen to be a site for trading services . With the token structure looks like a security with the buy back. The business I would expect to be very cashflow positive already at a active user base of 700k so not sure of need for a token sale . Be interesting to know churn and activity metrics of the 700k

Rated 5 for team because Intention is clearly explained such as highly liquid utility token with Price rise mechanics. Most ICO's are doing this but not disclosing.
but to many dating applications out there.

Edited: changed my rating based on response from team.

Team: The team is very strong with Top Notch people in both - management and operational levels. I have met these guys in the conference in Dubai (19th of March 2018).

Vision: Vision is nice, - to improve the dating platform, but it is not life-changing product.

Product: Dating platforms recently do not offer new features. DateCoin lifts existing features to the new level and makes it more secure, transparent for its users.

I am more than sure that they will make successful ICO

Good team and interesting idea, good luck!

Having a working product already puts you miles ahead of many other projects as the proof of concept has been tested and demand gauged.

Strong and diverse team of advisors to guide this project on the right path

Definitely has some potential, at least in the russian market

This is a competitive space as many other projects are lolking to revamp online dating, so there is definitely some risk.

Good luck team!

Great idea and a working app!

700k existing users is a big plus in my book.
Team looks solid.
It's a competitive market. You need a distinct USP (unique selling point). Now your value proposition a bit too long and fuzzy. Fine tune and you can get a full score.

I like the concept, it's interesting. But am worried about how DateCoin is going to acquire customers in the highly saturated dating industry.

The Team must focus heavily on marketing and customer success.

A good idea that is different from many others. Behind the technologies of neural networks the future and if today these technologies are used in search algorithms, why so far no one thought to apply them in the day?
A strong team and product, which in case of implementation, will interest many!

Very promising project should the AI capabilities perform as described this platform should disrupt the Dating services Industry.

I like that DateCoin is based on successful and profitable dating service.
(Denim) that gained popularity in last few years in Russia; however, the dating service market is saturated. The technology does help solve some of the issues with dating sites, but in my opinion, as with any coin, market acceptance will be key.

1. A narrow CA that limits monetization. Moreover, the target audience is limited by the format-it is clear at once that Femina sells herself, unlike Tinder, where it is possible to be different and “wait for the tram” (and then all the same to divorce the man for money and privileges). Also, TSA is limited to and from the male side

2. CA is in abundance represented in other applications, taking its mass and the presence of a large selection of bodies.It is not obvious that you need to put Denim and pay to find a chick for money or sponsor. The cutting off women's CA because of the ideology and of moderation leads to the fact that individual locations are clearly insufficient number of females to create at least some market from solvent men in subscriptions.

3. Clipping of the flock due to the need to specify the size of the breast. From this, the reviews in the AppStore and Google have femin burns with a bright flame. What is appropriate for the model site is not quite appropriate for eat-application. Heifers also want to believe that even the first or second size will lead to the yacht to the strong world of this (an example of Nastya Fish shows that this is possible). Smaller flock, less interactions within the application, less subscriptions and payments.

4. The lack of a trial period. After installation you will be asked for the dough (such as checking creditworthiness). About the same sins and Pure. It is not pleasant already to men who logically want to examine at first “goods” and are afraid for data of the credit card.

5. Somehow paying audience are only men, although access oilman and banker famine are willing to pay (plastic, parties, courses, etc.). And as such whores to pimps and pimps also pay a Commission. So they can potentially pay here, if it is correct to sell by ideology and functionality.

6. Constant glitches (see the reviews on the AppStore and Google Play) and problems with development.

7. To moderation, too, there are questions, after which a man's Target Audience will ask questions and fall off.

Good team and product

Hmmm...dating site on blockchain. What's next? Don't see any clear need of blockchain in this project - looks ridiculous, IMO