Rated on Jan 14, 2019
Modified on Feb 13, 2019
Even though KYC does not guarantee ICO success nor is a call for investment, the process verifies the key members of the founding team as a first key test.
Please perform your KYC with Sum & Substance promptly since your ICO starts in 67 days!
Willing to revise this rating if the team responds.
All the best!
Luigi Piccirillo → KYC Passed
Nikita Zanella → KYC Passed
Congratulations for passing the KYC!
1. Hardcap 2,000 BTC ~ US$7.2 million
2. Milestones → Alpha version release is scheduled for Q4 2019. This seems too far out as the community has to review the MVP first to get a better idea of this project.
3. Team → There is not a single member listed as part of the technical team?
4. On February 4th, I received a message from → Luigi Piccirillo 5:53 PM
"hi, after trying to contact you and not having received an answer, we reported it to ICObench for its misbehavior giving our project and other reviews 3.3.3. Good day."
I responded on February 5th Clemen Chiang, Ph.D. 4:10 AM
"It took you from 16 January to 4 February to respond to the KYC issue. Almost 18 days to be exact. But you gave me 3 days to respond to your message with a complaint to ICObench."
Now that I've returned from Lunar New Year celebrations, I've updated this rating accordingly.
That being said, it must be stated clearly that Experts on ICObench work on a voluntary basis. Projects should spend more time improving on their projects and engagement
with their customers. Please refrain from "attacking" Experts as it does not reflect well on the team.
All the best!
Rated on Feb 14, 2019
Modified on Feb 14, 2019
This is a refreshingly different project. The team is a little on the small side though. I think they could do with a few more resources. The team also doesn't seem to have much work experience.
None the less, I like the concept but just not sure if they have the experience and in house skills to pull this off.
Rated on Jan 12, 2019
Modified on Jan 12, 2019
Concept is good as they are verifying all portfolio on basis of certification identity.
Team is big as per thier update to me but they have shown less faces and lacking with KYC clearance.
Less token information provided thus less ratings from benchy too.
Happy with Vision and Product would suggest to Update more information about token and hardcap
Rated on Jan 12, 2019
Verification of identity by certification of portfolios something sounding technically to me.
detailed whitepaper with most of the information except team and token
Rated on Feb 18, 2019
The project is certainly interesting and with a revolutionary vision, although many will be opposed to the adoption of a blockchain that offers wallet containing the identity of the owner, as many people adopt the bloclchain because of the privacy and the anonymity that it offers. But this does not mean that the project can not become a success.
The team is very short and many key figures are missing for the development of such an ambitious project. Even the advisors are missing.
Social networks and communication channels also have very little community and are neglected from the point of view of the activity. Website and whitepaper very synthetic, many technical details, but little tokenomics, almost non-existent business plan, while the distribution of the token is not very accurate. No Softcap is presented, as well as the distribution of funds is absent.
Very good activity on github, the channel is frequently updated and contains a lot of work on the technical side of the project, certainly not to be overlooked, as well as the testnet (MVP), well done, working and that presents an excellent preview of the product that goes to be launched on the market. From this point of view excellent work, but you should fix all the details mentioned above, to begin to hope for a successful ICO. Today, investors want to see numbers, assets, business plans, value propositions and clear tokenomics.
There is a month left to the ICO's launch, I hope you will be able to improve all aspects in this time and allow me to increase the rating, as the project seems to be good.
We release information about the project on a daily basis.
Information on coins is complete just read this part:
The advisors in a project are not strictly necessary.
We have some but are not named, we will insert them on the page.
Rated on Feb 1, 2019
Modified on Apr 15, 2019
The Skelpy project aim is to create a totally decentralized and clear blockchain, in which every wallet has a certified digital identity. Transactions will be visible to everybody, but the individuals will be certified and recognized following visibility criterion explained ahead. So it will be possible for the user to issue transactions on the blockchain with a certified wallet (natural person or legal person) or with an uncertified wallet.
Working in the IT industry form more than ten years with technical figures to deliver the product planned. A key professional figure in the AML/KYC processes would be beneficial to the project.
Product is still at design phase, however the team understands correctly the needs, view, development of a platform in the virtual currency industry.
Good view of the necessities of the cryptocurrency industry and long-term business strategies planned.
Good choice of advisors working from long time in the crypocurrency industry.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.