PlaceToRent

Frankly the idea is not new and I don't see it is unique either. Some of ICOs of the same types I know are running such as RentBerry, CryptoBnB.. just a few to list. There are more out there.

My concern is that how to differentiate yourself from others as this market is highly competitive. The example of RentBerry is a lesson learned for many investors of losing investments.

Good luck to your project!

Not a unique idea and definitely not a new concept. This probably don't even need blockchain. There are already very successful companies in real world and lots of in crypto world. you need to share more information about how you are different and why do you need blockchain. All the best team!!

This ICO is not unique as compared with others in this market. ICOs need to be distinctive so investors can decide which to invest on and earn ROI from their investment.

Team is one thing I like for sure, with good members in there and advisors, but almost every ICO has them these days and I would look for something distinctive.

Definitely not a new idea and definitely not a unique one. There are competitors in the market already doing it. I don't see a USP of PlaceToRent. For this reason, I doubt that it will yield a good ROI for it's investors. All the best!

Saturated market.
And innovative ideas do not exist.
You can not make an investment unless USP exists.
The team looks nice, but block chaining technology is not necessary for this project.

Team - good experience for most of C-suite and core team, CTO doesn't have Project listed on LinkedIn which is a slight worry. Good international coverage and some useful advisors too. 5 once CTO/LinkedIn issue resolved.

Vision - I like the idea of creating a common sense approach to credit worthiness, which could be a groundbreaking development. This is essentially the USP for the project. However the business plan may work better with starting a pilot in a few areas and then expanding globally due to the many differences of rental markets, rules and regulations around the world. Disintermediation of the rental market and some of the ridiculous fees charged by agents is a good thing, not necessarily unique. I think the project hinges on the success of the credit rating for non-credit historied clients. If the team can make that work, it could have far reaching implications in other industries too. A major worry is the use of the tokens for rental payments - tokens tend to be volatile and thus landlords may not see them as suitable tender if they have mortgage repayments to make from rents received. Further to this is the extension of credit to customers with no credit history for deposit and fees. This may well over stretch the project's finances if defaults rise and the regulation and compliance for such a scheme on an international basis is prohibitive to implement.

Product - doesn't appear to be an MVP, so 3 until available.

I'll keep an eye on how the credit worthiness concept develops with this project, could be very interesting. Good luck to the team with the project implementation.

PlaceToRent’s idea isn’t new to the market so there needs to be clearly defined USP from the team. Fund raising is the only part of the project where implementation of blockchain makes sense. I think the team will find it challenging to bring investors on board this project.

A good business proposition.

The right vision to incorporate technology for building a platform to allow consumers to tap into vast portfolio of properties.

Will prove to be interesting when implemented on a global scale for key cities.

ICO not happening, claiming they will proceed on hedera. Team looks ok but changing their mind leaving frustrated investors behind is not the best idea for a cryptocurrency startup. Will put a new score when they really go on with hedera and give some interesting updates because for now,the concept looks like one of the thousand others in the same industry.

The token generation event has been suspended since the company is implementing hashgraph instead of ethereum.
I can only applaud such actions as I am convinced ethereum is not scaleable on a global level.
However, this also means no MVP.
And, what is even more shocking, it means this project will NOT BE OPEN SOURCE! Hedera hashgraph is closed source software. Which makes the entire concept of decentralization a joke.

Not sure what to think of this project. Ditching ethereum is smart and shows the team is savvy enough to have a place in the crypto community. However choosing for closed source software defeats the whole purpose of decentralization.

The concept itselfs is not the first of its kind, so getting it on the market fast will be key.

Product gets a score of 2 as it will inevitably be closed-source. Which makes it hard for investors to verify the code for scams.

I don't see that there is really a need to coduct an ICO. You could just pay the rewards in another currency which is also more convenient.

The assumption that there is a higher chance to rent a place when the landlord knows your grades or your internship history seems false to me. They care whether you can pay the rent in time, are clean and how long you stay.

The rental / lease space is getting extremely competitive. More and more companies are coming about on blockchain and even more off blockchain.

The team and advisors are solid.
The company will truly have to implement unique features in order to stay above the crowd.
A Landlords/Investors main objective is to generate revenue from his rentals. Other factors as far as schools, internships may be a bit of a stretch. Then again I may be wrong if those factors are not worthy of exploring.

I wish the team best of luck in bringing this concept to the rental market!

After the Rentberry ICO disaster I'm very hesitant about rental plays and that was a simpler project to execute. The team does have a real estate advisor and a founder that did investment properties. What real estate associations is this apart of? Are the Remax' of the world on board with changing up the rating system? It seems like the company wants to flip the model even more with "invisible credit/work history" while other platforms struggle to leverage existing rental frameworks. Offering landlords some tokens to take risks that they don't need to take.. I just don't think this will gain adoption as the barrier is being set too high in terms of number of changes & risk vs. reward. I give the team thumbs up for trying to come up with alternative methods I just don't see the point for blockchain project or token around this. AI projects do gain high valuations through VCs right now. Why not do that? Maybe there's enough money that comes in to help make it a reality. Good luck.

project should have some new features compare to which are present in market there are many competitors in market with good reputation what is model to compete them?

and one question it can be done without blockchain too, what is need of using blockchain ?