Tennessee Cracks Down on Prediction Markets, Orders Kalshi and Polymarket to Halt Sports Bets

Cryptocurrencies are considered a high-risk asset class. Investing in them may result in the loss of part or all of your capital. The content on this website is intended solely for informational and educational use and should not be interpreted as financial or investment advice.
Why Trust Us
Why Trust Us
Prediction Markets, Orders Kalshi and Polymarket to Halt Sports Bets

The Tennessee Sports Wagering Council (SWC) issued cease-and-desist orders on January 9, directing three prediction market platforms—Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com’s derivatives exchange—to immediately stop offering sports-related betting contracts to residents of Tennessee.

According to official filings, the SWC determined that these platforms failed to meet the state’s consumer protection standards. Regulators argue that the contracts offered by prediction markets are effectively sports wagers, regardless of whether they are framed as financial derivatives.

Classified as Illegal Sports Gambling

The SWC concluded that the event-based contracts provided by the platforms fall squarely under Tennessee’s legal definition of sports betting. Because the companies do not hold SWC-issued licenses and have not paid required state taxes, regulators labeled the activity an “immediate and serious threat to the public interest.”

The council ordered the companies to:

  • Void all unsettled sports-related contracts entered into by Tennessee residents
  • Refund all user funds by January 31, 2026

Failure to comply could trigger escalating penalties.

Fines, Criminal Liability, and Regulatory Tensions

Under the enforcement framework, initial violations carry fines of $10,000, increasing to $15,000 for subsequent offenses. In severe cases, companies could face criminal charges for aggravated promotion of gambling, a felony under Tennessee law.

The crackdown highlights growing friction between state gambling regulators and federally regulated derivatives platforms. Kalshi and Polymarket have repeatedly argued that they operate under the oversight of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), not state gambling authorities.

However, Tennessee is not acting alone. At least 10 U.S. states have issued similar orders against prediction markets, and Massachusetts has escalated its actions into litigation, underscoring the unresolved jurisdictional conflict between state gaming laws and federal derivatives regulation.

As scrutiny intensifies, the industry is closely watching how Kalshi, Polymarket, and Crypto.com respond and whether federal regulators will step in to clarify the regulatory boundary.

 

By Patrick Johnson

Patrick Johnson is a seasoned crypto journalist and analyst with a sharp eye for emerging trends in blockchain, DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 innovation. With a background in tech writing and years of experience tracking digital assets, Patrick breaks down complex topics into clear, actionable insights for investors, builders, and curious readers alike. His work spans market analysis, crypto regulation, decentralized finance ecosystems, and interviews with founders shaping the next phase of the internet. Patrick's writing has appeared in leading crypto publications and has earned a reputation for depth, clarity, and a no-hype approach to crypto journalism. When he’s not decoding the latest protocol upgrade or reporting on DAO governance shifts, you’ll find him experimenting with smart contracts or hiking off-grid, because even crypto authors need to unplug sometimes.