Oleg SharpatiyICO team member replied on 22 Nov 2018
Dear Igor,
With all due respect to your background listed on your LinkedIn profile, unfortunately, we found this review is looks superficial and unfounded. Perhaps at the time of writing the review you did not have the opportunity to study the project. The review does not present a technical analysis of the solution in question, nor does it highlight its significance for the entire non-profit sector and the market of crowdfunding for projects. We would like to note that we are not engaged in ICO consulting, nor are we creating a decentralized exchange. At the moment, our product is operational (one of the few on the market), and contracts have been signed with more than 25 projects regarding the use of the platform and protocol. We would also like to note that we do not have a head of ICO projects, and the appearance of such a position was possible in extremely early versions of the white paper, which were available more than 9 months ago. The team is diversified and has a wealth of experience in developing blockchain projects, as can be seen by analyzing the GitHub https://github.com/w12-platform. Based on the above, we would like to ask you to correct your review or provide reasonable arguments for further discussion.
With all due respect to your background listed on your LinkedIn profile, unfortunately, we found this review is looks superficial and unfounded. Perhaps at the time of writing the review you did not have the opportunity to study the project. The review does not present a technical analysis of the solution in question, nor does it highlight its significance for the entire non-profit sector and the market of crowdfunding for projects. We would like to note that we are not engaged in ICO consulting, nor are we creating a decentralized exchange. At the moment, our product is operational (one of the few on the market), and contracts have been signed with more than 25 projects regarding the use of the platform and protocol. We would also like to note that we do not have a head of ICO projects, and the appearance of such a position was possible in extremely early versions of the white paper, which were available more than 9 months ago. The team is diversified and has a wealth of experience in developing blockchain projects, as can be seen by analyzing the GitHub https://github.com/w12-platform. Based on the above, we would like to ask you to correct your review or provide reasonable arguments for further discussion.