W12

The vision looks ungrounded - "up to 95% of funds invested in failed projects are retained" and still "projects will be able to raise funds without initial costs and with 0% commission on the W12 platform" etc. Sounds like a number of attractive slogans not financially binded together in business planning numbers. Mainly looks like another project to get funds for creation of one more ICO consultant and decenralised exchange. No competitive analysis attached! The problem is the with team as well. For example, "Head of ICO projects department" - is a former realtor with a pedagogical education, I have checked Linkedin profiles. The founders also dont have experience both in ICO or blockchain. The team is too localised. After the second investigation I am worsening my rating.

Team ★★★★
Vision ★★★★
Product ★★★★

The team is too localized and lack ICO and blockchain background. They need international specialists to get your fundraising goals and solve future challenges.
The whitepaper is full of standard phrases and there are hundreds of similar projects.

EDITED
Mark improved after read new information.

Team: really good team with top rated advisors. Team has got lots of updates on github, you can see team is working really hard.

Vision:The idea is amazing. They are creating Kickstarter kind of website using blockchain where blockchain based projects can apply for funding. They are providing full ecosystem for business to raise funding.

Product: MVP is live and looks amazing. MVP is like almost like finished product.

Best of luck team. I will definitely follow the progress of this ICO.

A much needed project which can have a big impact on the industry. Looking forward to testing this out. Need to continue progressing with development and look forward to seeing updates

The team is localized but has excellent counselors. Future growth can be expected.
Although the idea is not innovative, I think that there is not yet a strong rival project in this market.
MVP is wonderful, you can see that this team has development capabilities.

Great team - very active and very good social presence. Actively code commits done by experienced programmers in github.
Detailed white-paper with sufficient business and technical information.
I think W12 creates is a true decentralised system and blockchain use-case to help disputes management and settlement quicker at a lower cost.
Tested MVP - many projects already listed on the W12 platform so looking forward they raising funds using W12 platform.

1) Team looks kind of weak. No real blockchain or ICO experience from what I was able to find on LinkedIn. Very localized which might be a bad thing for such project. However, some points go toward them for the advisory board. Will this be enough is a question that still stands.

2) Presence of one sentence reviews on here make me raise a flag on a possibility of a review tampering case.

3) While I dig the idea and see that there is some clear vision of it, the project itself looks undeveloped to say the least. The whitepaper is filled with standard phrases and lacks details in my opinion.

The team has been completed, and experts from each field are complete.
There are opinions that matter that the team is localized, but originally it is such a team. Discuss closely and, after making decisions, unite and do the work.
Certainly fraud is rampant and it is difficult to distinguish between projects that should be trusted and projects that are not. If transactions that do not require a trust relationship are done safely, I think that it is one point of arrival.
Token balance is well thought out, and MVP is better than anything else.

Great idea. Team and vision is great.

W12 is widely represented at all possible conferences thanks to its huge road show. The fact that you can find Russian names inside the team does not mean the team is localised. Russians are excellent scientists and entrepreneurs. According to the profiles the team makes a brilliant communication at international markets.

One can check GitHub and see the number of the team updates there. In my opinion today it is one of the most active and live projects that besides solves one of the most important problem of the whole market. CTO has more than 10 year experience in startup incubator. Developers have a significant blockchain experience.

I like the fact that these guys pay so much attention to different communities in 20 languages. Such international way of making business is different from other ICOs.

Avantages :


- 1ère place au World Blockchain Forum, finaliste de l'ICO Race.

- Équipe hautement expérimentée.

- Les Tokens des fondateurs, de l'équipe & des conseillers sont gelés pour 2 ans.

- Un projet avec peu de concurrence pour le moment.

- Un hard cap assez bas.

- Si le projet fonctionne, permettra d'éviter au maximum les scams.

- Est utile pour les investisseurs comme pour les entrepreneurs.

- Tous les fonds levés par la vente du token d'un projet sont bloqués dans un smart contract. Mais l'équipe n'a pas accès à ces fonds jusqu'à la mise en œuvre de toutes les étapes déclarées dans la roadmap et la décision des acheteurs du token.

- Une roadmap claire.

- Permet le remboursement d'une partie de notre investissement si l'ICO listée par la plateforme est un scam.


Inconvénients
​

- W12 devra miser beaucoup sur le marketing pour développer son réseau. Sans cela le projet n a pas d'avenir.

- Interdit aux USA.

- Sur une précédente version du site , on peut voir que W12 estimait avoir 2 milliards de marketcap pour 2021 ce qui est sans doute un peu trop prometteur.

- Nelly Pankovichenko qui est RI et développement des affaires est une modèle photo, elle parle bien de W12 sur son facebook mais pas sur son instagram, on peut également trouver la photo utilisé sur le site w12 sur une site de vêtement. Nous avons donc du mal à comprendre ce qu'elle peut apporter au projet si vraiment elle en fait partie.

- Certains des advisors ne citent pas W12 dans leur profil.

- Pas de cadre juridique.

I struggle to understand why so many one sentence reviews on here.

This looks more like a fund raiser than a decent project. The whitepaper just throws around phrases with no real facts.

For those that know me I like to look at teams and this one is poor. They have no real experience in this field. Did you all sit around a table and give each other job titles?

interesting project with a large team (although I would like to see some more devs) and a good vision that moves with the market trend of accountabillity.

The team definitely looks experienced and they have got some good advisors as well. Could use some more developers though. As for the idea, I like it and believe in it's potential but it will all depend on how well they can execute it.

Whitepaper is written well and explains pretty much everything they are planning to do. Best part is that they have an MVP ready with over 100 projects already listed.

Solid project, few others doing similar offerings.