Translate the page
Feel free to ask any questions, leave your comments, wishes and suggestions regarding the Google Translation at our Telegram Chat.
Like this video
 

Ratings Viaz

Decentralized P2P Funding Platform

The utility of VIAZ is to provide a decentralized funding platform, connecting its users and acting as a conduit between the cryptosphere and fiat currency.

3.5
13 expert ratings
4.6
3.2
3.3
3.1
View rating distribution
Starts in 69 days 17 hours
2019-03-30 - 2019-06-30
Token
VIAZ
Price
1 VIAZ = 0.065 USD
Bonus
Available
Bounty
MVP/Prototype
Platform
Accepting
ETH, BTC, XTZ
Soft cap
5,000,000 USD
Hard cap
30,000,000 USD
Country
Whitelist/KYC
KYC & Whitelist
Restricted areas
USA
More on ICO
Report

Ratings

Clemen Chiang
Ph.D. | CEO | FinTech in Stocks | Blockchain in Cryptos | Author of Amazon Best Sellers in Online Trading
Rated on Jan 14, 2019
3
3
3
10%

Is there a reason why the CEO's LinkedIn profile is not listed on ICObench?

Does this link belong to the CEO?
https://www.linkedin.com/in/peter-meronek-416462175/

Something is very strange... CEO has just 3 connections?

Willing to revise rating if the team responds.

All the best!

Agree
-1
-1Disagree
Report
Hung Chih (Jason Hung)
Top ICO advisor |Cofounder of International Consensus Association | Investor | China Market
Rated on Jan 6, 2019
3
3
3
10%

1. CEO Linkedin missing. Hard to check reliability.

2. White paper no structure.

3. Too many competitor, recommend explain "why Viaz?" in the project summary.

4. No detail financial plan at white paper, Where can I find "why 8M softcap?"

5. Tezos market cap compare to ETH only 2% of ETH size. And it's a centralized organization. How can Viaz promise decentralized P2P on a the centralized business service?

Agree
-1
-1Disagree
Report
Kyon Yoshihara
Direct Marketing Manager,ICO produce
Rated on Dec 25, 2018
4
4
3
8%

There are many projects to realize the platform for raising funds, but I felt that their project was outstanding among them.
I think that it can be expected project.

+7Agree
+7
Disagree
Report
Miruna-Maura Barbulescu
Entrepreneur, Author and Marketing Specialist
Rated on Jan 4, 2019
2
3
3
8%

4 team members, 4 developers and 2 advisors and they aim to provide a decentralized funding platform. No MVP available yet. I seriously don't want to discourage them, but for such an ambitious project, in such uncertain times, you do need numbers. Or outsource them, but in that case, you need to provide this info somewhere.

Many other ICOs are working on a similar products and it is hard for me to understand what makes you different from existing ICOs.

The Whitepaper itself is little, with just 20 pages, big text and graphics. However, the project is still in its initial stage and it might improve in the future.

But as an advice for you is...recruit more qualified team members on board.

Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Savio Gomez
Fintech Blockchain AI, Faster Capital, UOCA, Captain, PhD, Auditor,
Rated on Jan 1, 2019
Modified on Jan 19, 2019
3
3
3
6%

*** Rating updated - reached out to me with regard to MVP. I haven't tested it.

DYOR, I am just thinking out aloud basis the information available at the time of writing this.

Smart-contract based lending platform, there are a few put there such platforms, but this one's does mention "crypto-collateral", interesting to see how this will play out.
How will lending exactly work and what kind of ROI for investors is something that needs to be addressed in greater detail.
Tezos is centralized if I'm not mistaken. And Viaz will offer decentralized P2P on a centralized business service?

Team, seems a tad small set up, KYC passed OK.
Considering the team size, present advisors, scope of this project, perhaps more members / known advisors are needed?

All the very best.

Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Himanshu Chander
CEO of AMBCrypto |ICO advisor | Serial Entrepreneur | Inventor | Marketing Service |
Rated on Dec 27, 2018
3
3
3
6%

Many of the ICOs are working on this idea, I didn''t see any big expert for this ICO.

They have passed the KYC, it simply mean that they are real people.

But I think they need some good expert for the marketing because market is full of this type of company.

Agree
-1
-1Disagree
Report
Krishnendu Chatterjee Ph.D.
Blockchain | Tokenization Strategist| Whitepaper|Tokenomics | BD| Technical- Market Analyst
Rated on Dec 28, 2018
3
5
1
5%

White paper - The white paper problem and solution statement is very clear. The idea of having a smart-contract based lending platform isn’t new but the crypto-collateral is quite interesting. The white paper has failed to mention the specifics about lending. The white paper has almost enough to educate investors about their project. A bit more effort is needed to show investors the value of investing in this project in terms of expected ROI generation with market penetration.

Team - The team composition and advisory is small but capable. Inspite of that they seriously need to add team members for making it diverse in terms of PR, marketing, etc capabilities.

Tokenomics - They have not mentioned the token generation amount and funds deployment as of yet.

Business Model - The business model is clear - Use tokens as collateral to take loans and earn by keeping tokens as collateral. But the rate of 1% p.a as service fee is quite low to be honest and needs a detailed analysis if this amount is sufficient for the company to operate on. The also lack a clear roadmap about reaching various markets and increasing user base.

MVP/ DApp/ Working Product  - They claim to come up with a test net before token emission. No MVP as of yet.

Great idea but small team composition and lack of specifics makes me wary.

Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Sayali Joshi
Blockchain & ICO Advisor, ICO MARKETING, PR, IBM Certified Developer, BLOCKCHAIN EXPERT
Rated on Jan 9, 2019
3
3
2
5%

Idea is not creative, and whitepaper is not describing as per my requirements, it should be more explaining.

CEO can’t be reached as no information of social media provided and advisors team consist only two members.

Team needs to do more work on profiles, vision and products

Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Jayesh Trivedi
Crypto Exchanger
Rated on Jan 12, 2019
3
3
3
5%

Less information of CEO, many funding platform coming now a days so its hard to get place in top.

White paper is not more managed, team is having only 2 advisors

Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Ravi kash
Blockchain Expert | Fintech Consultant | ICO Advisor |PR and Marketing Expert
Rated on Jan 16, 2019
4
3
5
4%

Linked in missing hard to check reliability
White paper has no structure. Financial plan not explained in white paper Tezos market cap compare to ETH only 2% of ETH size. And it's a centralized organization.

Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Ajit Kumar Jain
ICO Legal Advisor
Rated on Dec 27, 2018
5
5
5
4%

It's a great ICO. It has introduced innovative products solutions with the use of Blockchain Technology.............overall very good ICO to invest.
...


+3Agree
+3
Disagree
Report
Julien Trottier
ICO Advisor Researcher and Analyst
Rated on Dec 21, 2018
4
4
5
4%

I seem to be the first expert giving a rating to this project. Benchy gave a 4.3 and after taking a closer look, I understand why.
Their team passed the KYC, they have is a page on Bitcoin Wiki, they have a working MVP.
They will need more advisors.
The project is not very original but innovative on the Tezos platform.
Good luck Team

+3Agree
+3
Disagree
Report
Nirav Kuwarji Gala
ICO and STO Advisor
Rated on Jan 4, 2019
1
1
1
2%

Team - Based on the review of the team credentials in the whitepaper and social media it appears that they do not have any significant experience in running a lending business.

Vision - The idea of the project is not new and there are already many projects who are doing similar things. Use of blockhian technology is not the core requirement for what the project aims to do, as most of the things can be done effeciently done off-chain. Infact those thing would be cumbersome if done on blockchain due to inherent scalablity issues with existing blockchains protocols.

Product - It appears that the project is currrenlty at ideation stage. Though it is mentioned in the whitepaper that the development is in progress, the project has not been able to provide any evidence to support its claim.

Overall not a very compelling project which should warrant any significant attention untill they can deliver something tangible.

Disclaimer: Above is my personal opinion and not an investment recommendation. Please do your own research and take independent financial advice before making any decision

You can find my raiting methodology here. https://medium.com/@niravgala/nirav-galas-ico-bench-rating-methodology-c7186a354c9e

Agree
-1
-1Disagree
Report
Benchy
ICO analyzer bot
4.6
22%

Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.

Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.

Bookmark
ICO KYC Report
2 members invited
Peter Meronek
Passed
Stephen Andrews
Passed
KYC procedure verifies selected/specific team members only. It does not guarantee ICO success nor is a call for investment.
Missing or incorrect data? Let us know.
Join our Official ICObench group on TelegramOfficial ICObench Telegram group

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Learn more Got it