TrustVerse

Great experienced team.
Solid whitepaper with detailed business and concept.
Good social media presence.
I liked the concept but needs some more innovative approach compare to similar existing projects and MVP will be good to have.

This is a very mature team with solid investment from institutional investor.
I met with CEO and advisor several days ago. They are majorly focus offline investment collection in past of few weeks, now planning on line promotion.

I foresee this is a success project, just have to know more about the game rule to ICO

I like the team. WP is good and numbers look in line. The problem I have here is that many doing the same thing. I would like to know more about strategy. I will revise if team reaches out.


Ratings are that of opinion and not to be financial advice of any kind and in no way should be considered endorsement of any project. Please, do your own due diligence on anything you invest in!

team is traditional and average. about vision there are several ICOs with the same vision ... about the Product I dont Find any kind of MVP. I will suggest to Focusing on marketing as there are competition on the market

No KYC. No member in team seems to have past ICO or blockchain project experience.

Too many similar products, I do not see clear strong differentiation.

I think the project will have a hard uphill time.

Seems like a good team but there are now many asset management projects in crypto space!
Disclaimer: This is an independent review on the ICO and does not lead to investment advice. ICOs are risky, kindly do your own research before investment.

Too many projects trying to do the same thing as Trust Verse. I don't see any major USP. Team lacks strong blockchain experience on top of that.

Disclaimer: This is my independent review on this ICO and does not constitute any investment advice. ICOs are risky, kindly do your own research before investing.

Team good with experienced advisory board. But Some team members Linkedin profile missing. Please update this. KYC Done. Waiting for MVP.

Disclaimer: This is an independent review on the ICO and does not lead to investment advice. ICOs are risky, kindly do your own research before investment.

This is another asset management ICO...

This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.

I have read the documentation of this project, and my observations are as it follows.

The team is rather small and should be enhanced for this project to succeed.

The vision is good.

No MVP available yet but the product seems to have potential once it will be out there.

The white paper has been completed and it is designed to be very easy to understand. However, the team seems to lack industry analysis and market analysis. There are many similar projects in this industry, I do not see a clear USP here. The team seems to be intelligent, but if the team has MVP it will prove that they can do this.

I think it is a very wonderful concept project.
It seems that talented people are gathering at team members.
However, there are many other projects using AI, but I think that it is difficult to understand how this project is differentiated compared with its competitors.

The marketplace for crypto asset management is overheated already. Too many competitors with no viable products and very poor results.
Using combinations of words like "AI" or "Machine Learning" makes the concept sexy, but it doesn't prove it.
This is not an innovative concept, but I wish the team best of luck!

Would be interesting to know more about their strategies to grow adoption and ensure that they achieve the network affect needed to ensure an active level of usage of their product.

The team is good, the whitepaper and the roadmap are well structured and detailed.

But in my opinion the idea is not very innovative, there are many really similar projects.

The team has a lot of work to do to clarify what TrustVerse is bringing to the market. Apparently there don't seem to be big differences with other past projects.

The team is too small and some LinkedIn profils are missing...
The project is good but there are too much competitors on the market.
No MVP available yet.

There is a number of similar projects out there and so the vision is not a unique one. The team seems ok - I need more information in order to give a higher score here.

So many asset management projects in the cryptosphere - how will TrustVerse differentiate themselves from the pack?

Disclaimer: Rating and or commentary provided represents my own personal view and is not to be relied upon as advice. I am not a financial advisor nor am I registered in any jurisdiction with any financial services regulator. I provide no recommendations that any offering should be bought, sold or held. Before making financial decisions please undertake your own due diligence and consult a financial advisor.

Project don't have kyc this seems something shocking for me in current scenarios, if they add MVP than i can increase my rating.

We can't fully based on ideas there should be something to show i hope team will achieve whatever they are planning.

Please comeback to me stating why there is no KYC ? if it satisfies me i will redo ratings.

Till that time best of luck

The concept is good, however the team is rather small. On the other hand they passed their KYC so they are real people.
Their vision is not so spectacular, but it seems to be going in the right direction.
About the product, I am unsure what to say after reading their documentation. They have no MVP available and from what I've read it is not something so spectacular as well. However, I wish them the best of luck to prove me wrong and bring their project to the moon!

Another wealth management project on blockchain!

I am impressed with the team! The vision is OK, its not unique in the while.

If they present MVP, it will help ICO success.

Good luck team!

FYI, your WP link is broken from ICObench website.

The team looks average, but their passion for the project is questionable as the marketing in their home country, Korea, is failing miserably.

They are also joining in on a heavily competitive field with many similar projects with a very poorly designed roadmap with no products or any MVP to display at the moment.

Does not offer anything new, interesting, or unique.

The team have the experience to carry out what has been stated.

Vision of platform and system is one that is needed in the industry and a use case.

Product only 4 based on ethereum and Dapp system which at present lacks users.

I hope the team and make it and offer this solution.

Good luck.

Unfortunately I think this market is fairly saturated at the moment, and without any clear difference to others, it will be a very difficult time to gain traction. The project's strength is in it's team, so it may be worth keeping an eye on to see where they go.

Disclaimer: This is an independent review on the ICO and does not lead to investment advice. ICOs are risky, kindly do your own research before investment.

While I respect Jason Hung's opinion I just cant get excited for this project- there are a lot of other companies in this space and there really isnt a differentiating factor- in such cases we generally look at the team and while its encouraging that they have completed the KYC, Im still not convinced this is the team that will be able to pull this off better or in a more meaningful way then their competitors.