ICO KYC Report
3 members invited
Ratings
All ratings published on ICObench serve informational purposes only. ICObench does not provide investment forecast, recommendations or any consulting for that matter. Thus, neither ICObench, nor the experts can be hold responsible for the visitors’ investment decisions. Read more
Dr. Rex Yeap
IP Blockchain inventor | Serial ICT inventor | Angel Investor | Quant | Educator | Meditator
Rated on Jul 2, 2018
Rated on Jul 2, 2018
1
1
1
12%
F1. I would like to invite Ezzeldin, Viktors and James to undergo the ICOBench KYC.
F2: What is your smart contact address?
F3: Thrintel Market is operating under which company - would appreciate if you could share with us (a) name of the company, (b) company website, (c) company registration number, (d) date of registration, and (e) country of incorporation.
F4. Who are the directors of F3(a)?
F5. Official Telegram group is: https://t.me/thrintelmarket with over 5000 members as at 2 July 2018 but a review of its history shows that over 95% of the members seems to be airdropers or bounty hunters.
F6. I will revise my ratings after receiving further responses to above questions & the ICOBench KYC.
+1Agree
+1
Disagree
Report
Nikolay Shkilev
PhD | Entrepreneur | CEO | ICO Advisor | Crypto enthusiast | Blockchain expert | Public speaker | Mentor
Rated on Apr 11, 2018
Rated on Apr 11, 2018
1
1
1
6%
This rating's weight is reduced by 50% as there is no review added.
Paul Cliffe
ICO advisor|Crypto-asset and ICO investor| Libertarian|CEO of Block Venture Project
Rated on Aug 27, 2018
Rated on Aug 27, 2018
2
3
1
11%
Team - no team members list the project on LinkedIn. All hold requisite industry experience, but no KYC passed and there needs to be a more holistic approach to team structure and size to make a project like this a success, in my opinion (legal, finance etc)
Vision - tough to get to grips with, no real explanation of the problems they look to solve. No mention of how they will spend funds, cost of service etc. There is a need for such a market platform however, but this vision needs better explaining.
Product - no MVP on website.
+2Agree
+2
Disagree
Report
Paresh Masani
Engineer
Rated on Aug 27, 2018
Modified on Aug 27, 2018
Rated on Aug 27, 2018
Modified on Aug 27, 2018
1
1
1
11%
Red flag!
This project shouldn't be listed here.
Absolutely no information anywhere including white-paper, social media anywhere!
I would want this project to be removed from ICObench!
+3Agree
+2
-1Disagree
Report
Vladimir Manzyuk
Blockchain/System Analyst
Rated on Apr 3, 2018
Rated on Apr 3, 2018
1
1
1
9%
- Small team
- unclear white paper
- Not working links to all legal documents (on web site)
+1Agree
+1
Disagree
Report
Gauthier Bros
Gauthier Bros
Rated on Dec 30, 2018
Rated on Dec 30, 2018
1
1
1
9%
This project need to be updated, i will be happy to do another review once all informations requiered to understand the ICO will be here.
- KYC for the team
- All financial datas
- LInk to social networks
- MVP
A project like this seems dead, feel free to contact me once updated.
+2Agree
+2
Disagree
Report
Richard Kastelein
Publisher of Blockchain News (EST 2015), Director of Blockchain Partners, Director of Token.Agency
Rated on May 16, 2018
Rated on May 16, 2018
1
2
2
9%
Tiny team with nobody on it even mentioning this project on their Linkedin profile. 20 page whitepaper is brutally hard to read with blue text on blue background and 20pt font. This is a bad punt, put a little more effort in you guys, come on!
+1Agree
0
-1Disagree
ReportExperts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.