Teambrella

Have MVP and interesting project. Peer-to-peer is a big business and hope to see more adoption soon.

This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.

"Teambrella's VC investor, Shanda Group is the largest shareholder of Lending Club."

Congratulations for raising seed capital from this Singaporean.

Interesting project, have MVp and app online. The soft cap and hard cap is reasonable. Also have some early market adoptation. Good single to investor, but a whole new business model than insurance worth to watch the long term availability.

team is fill up with developers and community managers. will be great if you take some international advisors on board.
about vision ...
I like the concept. softcap and hard cap is resonable.
Mvp
have mvp already and some market early adoption. best of luck team

I love the fact that it has MVP and it attacks a massive industry. I would love to see more solid team. KYC approved, which is good, but a solid team goes a long way in crypto.

Good use case of smart contracts plus they already have a working prototype. Team looks solid. the raise could be a little bigger though. Overall, looks solid. All the best!

Steady, fresh and innovative ideas.
It is also preferable that the reason for the existence of the block chain is clarified.
In Japan, for example, promoting the formation of teams involved in childbirth will be extremely popular.
Especially this part is not covered by insurance, it involves pain.
We expect to join specialist projects on ICO.

Good Team Member, KYC approved, which is good. But don't find Advisor Board in here. will be great If you create good advisor Board..

Concept and vision looking good. Soft cap and hard cap is reasonable.

Already have MVP and app online.... Best of luck for team and concept.

This one's tricky. (Also, my first review of an ICO).

I personally love the concept! As described in your video, insurance is currently a necessary evil. I feel any attempt at shaking up that status quo and disrupting the industry can be hugely beneficial.

It's great to have a live platform, additionally, it's great that it's backed by a VC RELEVANT to the industry.

That said, it's a little concerning (at least at this point) that no one in the core team comes with any relevant financial/insurance background. Moving forward, if you'd add more people on board who come with that knowledge who could potentially aid in the execution and growth of the company that would be beneficial. Aside, I don't completely understand the holding of 35% of your tokens for your team, that are anyway vested. There's probably logic behind that figure, but it's not completely evident to me as yet.

Advice at this point - work on strengthening up the team with people with relevant experience, because cracking into the insurance market isn't going to be easy by any means, no matter how great the vision for this product is. And if you can't crack the market, you can't justify an investment.

Good luck though! Looking forward to what's potentially in store from this one.

At first glance, this project looks promising. Team looks solid, with prior experience and qualifications. The idea that individuals form teams to cover costs as an alternative to insurances looks ideal. Everyone hates insurance companies. However there are some things that need a more detailed explanation. For example, I understand that there is a flaw in the voting process when the majority of the voters want to exploit other members of the team. Let me know if I am wrong

Insurance is ripe for disruption and I have no doubt we will see many better way to insure those things which we value.

the team at Teambrella appear to be on the right track. So are others. Market adoption will be the challenge

Well designed project, VC backed so a proper Due Diligence has probably been done.

Bringing Insurance Service on the Blockchain is one of the major Use Cases for this technology.

A functional product, a team with experience and worldwide representatives.
I appreciate the unique business model: not providing insurance but removes the need for it.
The team nevertheless tackles a large market with strong pre-established competition.
Soft cap & Hard cap achievable. I would advise the team to recruit more advisors and perhaps increase advertising to boost their social networks and attract investors.

Low initial valuation (low HC) combined with insurance that is a good use case for smart contracts, makes this a more interesting project than most in my view.
I also like that there is a working platform already.
The team could be strengthened further in terms of of industry diversity.
Overall, looks good!

Your addressable market is not 3 trillion, that is a preposterous statement showing little to no research into the immediate market which is ready to be served by your service. That number is only shown by existing users using it and there are none.

Insurance companies is one thing we can all agree upon, is that we hate dealing with them.

Peer to peer insurance is a tricky aspect, even though the company mentions that insurance licenses may not be required in all jurisdictions, some may give difficulty in operating there.

The idea and concept is good as everything is going peer to peer and taking out the middle man to offer savings.
The team is good, diversifying more members and advisors should be explored.

Having seed capital from a VC is a definite plus along with a MVP and some market use.
Gaining additional market share and expanding on a global scale will take tremendous effort for success.

Developers and community managers. Would like to see more industry experts and legal advisory in profile though it's great VC backing them has financial sector experience. The raise is small which makes me question why going ICO route vs. doing a Series raise through VCs. Vision is positioned as a noble one although I believe insurance is a symptom of a greater problem that needs addressing.

I think this is a curious and interesting project. They already have in place an application although I haven't taken a look yet. So no need to waste investors money in the development of a product - rather they will focus on the adaptation and continued improvement upon what they have.

Great to see they have a working product already live. However the team doesn't really have any insurance background.

Likewise, while the insurance model is ripe for disruption, it's going to be hard to convince people to invest in people not ruining their products than it is in stocks, property or even crypto.