ICO KYC Report
2 members invited
Ratings
All ratings published on ICObench serve informational purposes only. ICObench does not provide investment forecast, recommendations or any consulting for that matter. Thus, neither ICObench, nor the experts can be hold responsible for the visitors’ investment decisions. Read more
Clemen Chiang
Ph.D. | CEO | FinTech in Stocks | Blockchain in Cryptos | Author of Amazon Best Sellers in Online Trading
Rated on Aug 24, 2018
Modified on Sep 21, 2018
Rated on Aug 24, 2018
Modified on Sep 21, 2018
2
2
2
14%
As raised by Dr. Rex Yeap in the ratings, the CFO did not respond since 14 April 2018. This is more than 4 months since the matter has been brought. It warrants attention.
Will revise this rating after this issue is addressed.
+1Agree
-1
-2Disagree
Report
Dr. Rex Yeap
IP Blockchain inventor | Serial ICT inventor | Angel Investor | Quant | Educator | Meditator
Rated on May 1, 2018
Modified on Mar 27, 2019
Rated on May 1, 2018
Modified on Mar 27, 2019
1
2
1
13%
First review on 7 April 2018.
P1. Name of Company: TAKLIMAKAN NETWORK PTE. LTD. (TNPL)
UEN: 201808521M
Address: 176, JOO CHIAT ROAD, #02-02, SINGAPORE 427447
Please send me your ACRA Business Profile for further review.
P2. I would also like to invite the key team members: Rashid Yussup, Rustam Kairy, Yong Ming Hong to undergo ICOBench KYC.
------------
Updated review on 14 April 2018
U1: Through an intermediary, I have received and reviewed the TNPL ACRA Business profile and of the 3 registered shareholders, only Rashid is among them. The other two shareholders Andrey and Rakesh are not in the core team, ie. they could be just pure investors and that I understand. There is only one nominated director of the company (same person as IP Invest Pte. Ltd of another foreign ICO) and I would encourage that one of the shareholders be a director of TNPL as part of good corporate governance.
U2. Two of the core team members have passed ICOBench KYC which is +ve. For unknown reasons, Yong Ming Hong did not go through the KYC.
Will revise my ratings after MH has pass the ICOBench KYC.
------------
Updated review on 27 March 2019
U3. Due to zero response from the team, I'm revising my rating of this project from 2 3 2 to 1 2 1
+1Agree
0
-1Disagree
Report
Richard Kastelein
Publisher of Blockchain News (EST 2015), Director of Blockchain Partners, Director of Token.Agency
Rated on Apr 4, 2018
Rated on Apr 4, 2018
5
4
4
12%
Yet another community investment type ICO platform. Nothing that unique here. Team is strong however. Good to see projects coming out of central Asia for a change. Whitepaper a little thin. And no numbers on token distribution, just a lot of purple and pink.
+3Agree
+1
-2Disagree
Report
Rick Tapia
Blockchain Advisor and Consultant
Rated on Feb 27, 2018
Rated on Feb 27, 2018
5
5
4
12%
Very excited to see where this one goes although certain aspects of the product are not unique. Execution will be key.
+4Agree
+3
-1Disagree
Report
Purushotham Maralappa
Consulting Manager at Emurgo, Blockchain and Tokenization advisor
Rated on Apr 3, 2018
Rated on Apr 3, 2018
5
4
5
6%
This rating's weight is reduced by 50% as there is no review added.
George Han
ICO Advisor
Rated on Apr 15, 2018
Rated on Apr 15, 2018
4
5
5
11%
Good platform which will help to build a community for crypto stakeholders.
+4Agree
+2
-2Disagree
ReportExperts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.