Rated on Oct 1, 2018
In itself, this is not a bad project at all. I guess it is the issue with whether it is a security or not. Also no info on the project itself much here. Could be worrying.
Rated on May 8, 2018
Great team ! Great project!
Rated on Sep 22, 2018
The cycle of monetization is not clearly stated well and I do not know the basis of hard caps and soft caps. This is a statistically pretty huge hard cap. The use of the collected list is not revealed.
Rated on Aug 21, 2018
It seems to me this is a bad project and like a ponzi scheme without any good plan on how to make profits to pay holders interest. With guaranteed 10-20% without a convincing business plan and a very think team without well known advisors, it is rather like a scam project. One more thing is that no timeline set for ICO is also a big question.
Will never invest in such a untransparent project!
Rated on Aug 22, 2018
First impressions matter. So if you dont allow people to view your whitepaper without asking for an email, you are playing with fire.
You pissed me off from the first moment I checked your whitepaper. This should always be freely accessible on the internet and NOT require an opt-in!
Now to the actual project: The idea of a simplified investment platform is a decent goal. Lowering the barrier for investors is definitely needed in the crypto markets.
Having said that, there are a few things that confuse and surprise me in this project:
- Combination of both Stellar and ERC-20 tokens. This couldve been handled better by using other blockchains such as EOS or bitshares.
- The whitepaper has very little information on how exactly it will work from a technical perspective. This rings all kinds of alarm bells for me.
These kinds of project balance between being a ponzi scheme and a decent investment project.
This rating might chance if more information is released about this project.
Rated on Feb 6, 2019
No information, no updates, a tweet every 2 months. Github non-existent, team of 5 members, I could only see from the icobench profile because my system and connection protections have completely blocked the opening of the page of their official website, warning me that I could go to malware and phishing. Advisor absent.
Whitepaper inaccessible as the email address is requested and I honestly find it annoying that you ask data to people who simply want to read it, this would give much thought to investors as well. Since I could not verify anything about the technical part of the project, my evaluation is minimal.
Rated on Jul 1, 2018
Modified on Jul 1, 2018
At first, I thought this would be a great project，but the truth is disappointing. I was invited to participate their airdrop program, and I got about 5k tokens of this project on my account. They emailed me several times to invite me to invest in their ICO, but I didn't participate. Today, I tried to log in my account on Superbloom, and I find out that I have lost access to my account. I tried to reset the password, and it didn't work out. I told the facts in their Telegram channel, and I got banned.
Based on what really happened to me related to this project, I suggest everyone to stay away from this project for now.
Update: I have got back the access to my account on Superbloom.
Rated on Jun 26, 2018
Modified on Jun 26, 2018
I've been through Superbloom's whitepaper. Strong team. Platform is for other ico projects to list. Intention is for their to have only reputable projects list. You then receive a portion of bounty that other projects give, in exchange for your due diligence as a user (who opts in). A lot of work required for passive users going forward. This solution is built on the bounty issuing craze.
I'm not 100% convinced on the business model that this product is based on. Bounty should ideally be issued for real, tangible resource contributions. Just sitting, receiving bounty for reading the terms/details of the project seems akin to anyone clicking Yes on the Terms and Conditions of various products we seek, without understanding it. Are users going to provide honest, meaningful feedback? Or is this a formal platform that emulates what many bounty-focused telegram groups do (just list projects with bounties, and have users mindlessly apply). The video paints a picture of the current state of the ecosystem, but does not shed light on the project proposed.
Rated on Feb 7, 2019
I could not test "MVP". It is set to private. And these platforms are so common. You have to show us something new.This is very uncertain and the future is invisible.
Rated on Apr 8, 2019
Modified on Apr 18, 2019
Company dissolved and project abandoned.
If you purchased these tokens you can open a claim at their new website (dot xyz), the old one was shut down.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.