Ratings

Rated on Apr 4, 2018

Rated on Apr 13, 2018
So much more to improve, project-wise, I hope to see its progress, good concept.

Rated on Mar 21, 2018

Rated on Mar 30, 2018
Very shady project. I see nothing there for investor gain with the model they are offering. Project seems very greedy and has no interest in the investor long term.
Another weird stuff is their "PR". Team just spammed my LinkedIn without explanations (willing to provide screenshots to ones interested). Fail to see MVP as well.


Rated on Mar 13, 2018
The ICO has very small online visibility and no activity on bitcointalk. Telegram channel has 200 subscribers, no activity in Slack. The fundraising might be unsuccessful if marketing and PR are not improved.
The white paper on the other hand very nicely outlines the platform and interconnecting parts. Makes a lot of sense and it has been very well designed.
It is not clear what is the role or the utility of the SPTX token.

Also the role of the SPTX Token is a security token and it is much better explained on our new whitepaper. Let me know if you can check it, happy to clarify.
Everything is much more specific and informative now thanks to everyone's feedback.
Thanks, again. Glad to be rated by an expert like you.

Rated on May 1, 2018
Video is delusional at best. While I love to see projects coming out of Latin America, this is too much of a money grab. Nobody has any experience in running startup accelerators or incubators it appears from looking at Linkedin profiles. This appears to be VC from SIG Capitales moving into the Blockchain space with little knowledge of the landscape.

Rated on Mar 13, 2018
Team: Team is strong, but lacking Top Notch experts in their in-house team or advisory board.
Vision: The vision is not unique as there are few similar projects. However, the team that will make this vision come true, will have huge traction
Product: The set of products is not unique, but the combination of them will create big synergy for their "clients". Again, everything will depend on the execution.

We believe this makes our advisory board much stronger. Check it out and let us know.
Our Whitepaper has been updated too, hopefully you can check it again. Much more specific and informative now.
Thanks, again. Glad to be rated by an expert like you.

Rated on Mar 14, 2018
The team itself lacks of experience, and the Advisors do not mention of been advising this project.
The vision is quite good, since the project may create a revolution in the world of Exchange and Startups, but the product has nothing yet realized, except great words promises.
Allocation of tokens is definitely debatable.

Thanks for your review. We have actually updated our website to show our Team and full Advisory Board. Also our Whitepaper has been made more clear and specific in our goals.
We believe the current team and advisors fit our project very nicely and will help us achieve our goals.
Hope you have a chance to review. Thanks again!

Rated on Mar 13, 2018
A great vision indeed but lack of clarity and non-availability of Live product may be a dampener though the team has stated that they will be coming up with an exchange in first week of April. Obtaining a financial liscence will be key otherwise handling fiat as claimed will be challenging though. Almost whole of the team is from El Savador as mentioned on their LinkedIn profiles and no connection found with Switzerland.

Thanks for your review. We have actually updated our website to show our Team and full Advisory Board. Also our Whitepaper has been made more clear and specific in our goals.
Our vision is to obtain existing bank infrastructure via acquiring banks. You can find more information on our new website and Whitepaper.
Hope you have a chance to review. Thanks again!

Rated on Mar 26, 2018
Seriously what a junk is this video?
Have an idea - we will help you do a cryptocurrency? An exchange? A card to avoid taxes? What are you talking about?
Guys go get an idea for a serious startup not for some extra crypto..
"The banking entities will support the legal aspects" - how you imagine doing this?
1. There are plenty of incubators, dex exchanges, crypto debit card providers. They have lots of problems and issues managing what they are doing. How you will be better? Who are your competitors?
2. It's virtually impossible to establish exchange in Switzerland. How will you accomplish your utopian exchange idea?
3. You are talking about many smart contracts to choose from, apps, platforms etc. Where are your credible developers? What is your expertise in software development?
4. Who are your partners? Have you ever managed a project of such complexity?
5. Profit sharing makes it a security token, in what jurisdiction are you incorporated for security offering?
This is the problem with some startups that wish to collect huge amounts of funds and don't have professional skills to manage this.
Guys my advise to you, please start with 500k and build MVP, lower your appetite for founders tokens, soft cap and hard cap is to be counted in convertible currency like ETH.

Rated on Mar 13, 2018
The team has advisors that seem to be a good fit for guiding them, although I find the team to young and I am not convinced they have all the necessary experience to pull this off.
The vision they have is grand, and provided they pull everything off, will have a significant impact on the space. However, on a product basis, it feels that they are spreading themselves perhaps too thin. They want to do many things at once; NOVA, SprintX and SwitchX.
From an investor's standpoint, the fact that they will only distributing 35% of their tokens is worrysome.

Thanks for your review. We have actually updated our website to show our Team and full Advisory Board. Also our Whitepaper has been made more clear and specific in our goals.
Since we are working on a lot, there's more clear steps on how we will achieve this to explain to everyone.
Hope you have a chance to review. Thanks again!

Rated on Mar 20, 2018

Rated on Mar 26, 2018
Like the changes you've made to meet the ICO best practices. Can totally see several of my recommendations in action. Yet some improvements are required on a side of data disclosure and product development.

Rated on Mar 29, 2018

Rated on Mar 20, 2018

Rated on Mar 21, 2018

Rated on Mar 19, 2018
Pros:
+- Aims to combine a variety of tools into a single solution package
+- Easy to read whitepaper but slightly basic; n̶o̶ ̶o̶n̶e̶-̶p̶a̶g̶e̶r̶ (updated - improved)
+ Already has 3 partners; creative marketing materials but not much online presence
Cons:
- No live demo
- Average team which lacks experience in the field (updated - more members but lack blockchain experience)
- Not a new innovative idea, lots of competitors

Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.