Rated on Apr 10, 2018
Rated on Jun 18, 2018
Modified on Jun 18, 2018
Team is good but don't have any international advisors.......
Have many competition now on the market ....... so it's very challenging for the ICO.
Don't have any MVP
Rated on Jun 28, 2018
Where to begin... The whitepaper has apparently been translated from another language, because the grammar and sentence structure is substandard.
I like the idea of creating an API to connect the blockchain to e commerce sites. They then explain how the transaction will be anonymous and the website will not be able to tell who made the purchase. I could see how this could be helpful for dark web purchases. However for normal everyday purchases if there is a problem with the order, if a refund is necessary, warranties, etc this system does not appear to be fit to handle it.
Rated on Jun 25, 2018
Reasonable hard cap, although their market seems to be very competitive. The vision is very good though, and so is their mission. If they can deliver their product, this ICO would be very successful. Big goals. Good luck!
Rated on Jun 27, 2018
Innovative product and a great vision, Team good but no international advisory board.
No MVP, So many Market competition at this time. Need to some improvement about team member and advisor board..
Rated on Jun 22, 2018
Modified on Jun 22, 2018
I like the idea and what they are trying to do but its strange that many of team so not mention teh project on Linkedin, I know thats not the be alla nd end all but if they are not prepared to publicly acknowelege working on teh prokect that doesnt bode well for marketing and fundraising
Rated on Jun 23, 2018
+ Good comparison of the existing cryptocurrencies (pg. 12 in whitepaper) but lack of evidence how they will support all features promised.
--- Their video starts with "Blockchain Technology is Imperfect" but proposed platform is going to be based on Ethereum Blockchain!
--- Lack of Team expertise in what they promising
--- No MVP or technical details
Rated on Mar 30, 2018
Modified on Sep 22, 2018
Very bad impressions about this project. Team is not answering on time in social network. It is looking like only one person behind this ICO. Vision is also not good one, because all they wait is only when ETH will reach $400 price. There is no live product as well.
Rated on Mar 18, 2018
The team or their marketing "specialists" are running an elaborate spam campaign in other projects Telegram channels.
UPD: rating updated after team reached me in Linkedin and persuaded me that they will thoroughly look into the issue and prevent any future spam attempts from unscrupulous bounty members.
Rated on Jun 20, 2018
The Sonder Team is lacking advisors which could help them gain traction for their product.
Small cap, which I like - it means that the team is confident they can do what they want, with not that many funds. However, they will be facing some stiff competition and I am unsure whether they are able to take a cut from the others in the space.
The project does not have anything to show for it yet, so we will have to see how everything plays out. They are planning to launch their mainnet in Q1 2019 - which is still pretty far away and competitors will have time to improve and close in as well.
Rated on Jun 19, 2018
I think they are competing in a very crowded space and do not have a USP to differentiate themselves. Plus, I am not too sure about the advisors they have hired.
Will have to wait and see how they execute.
Rated on Jun 25, 2018
As per my initial review and ecommerce stand point, it just and another payment method. The main things is that how they going to approach eCommerce giants and portals to be partner for utilizing their ecommerce wallet as a payment method.
Whitepaper does not mention the revenue model also it says 0% fee then how you will maintain the network to work 24*7?
Product is okay if the online industry adopts it as the key payment method but this require a lot of marketing because awareness of crypto in current market is still a few.
Lot of work to do for SONDER to make the product successful.
Rated on Jun 22, 2018
Lots of promises based on very little but words in sub-par English. Why would someone publish the Technical Paper after the ICO is beyond my understanding. For me, it's just a good enough reason not to trust the promises made by the team.
Rated on Jun 24, 2018
Very reasonable hard cap and low valuation to start with which is great for potential upside though makes it challenging to scale & gain a lot of traction quickly. Probably not as sexy as most of the highly hyped infrastructure projects that are currently out there raising but appears to be useful solution they are driving at and looking forward to seeing how this works out. I like to see a roadmap that extends out at least a few years to show the team has a well thought out master plan, have a bigger vision than just the initial product and way to grow adoption with targets to get to the level necessary to make it a viable project in the long run.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.