ICO KYC Report
2 members invited
Ratings
All ratings published on ICObench serve informational purposes only. ICObench does not provide investment forecast, recommendations or any consulting for that matter. Thus, neither ICObench, nor the experts can be hold responsible for the visitors’ investment decisions. Read more
Krishnendu Chatterjee Ph.D.
Blockchain | Tokenization Strategist| Whitepaper|Tokenomics | BD| Fundraising
Rated on Oct 8, 2019
Rated on Oct 8, 2019
4
4
3
25%
→ Blockchain Advantage - ✅❤️
→ White Paper - ✅
→ Team Composition - ✅
→ Token Economics - ✅
→ Business Model - ✅❤️
→ Social Media Presence - ✅❤️
→ Collaborations & partnerships - ⛔️
→ Fund Allocation - ⛔️
→ Legal Loopholes - ⛔️
→ MVP/ DApp/ Working Product - ✅
Advantage - The Whitepaper is comprehensive, but they must disclose the shortlisted market for implementation. A lot depends on that. The team is capable with a healthy mix of tech and non-tech people in each sector (although a bit small). The project has a holistic approach in solving the targeted issue. They have a patent giving them rights upto 7 years from now for implementing their idea in Australia, atleast.
Disadvantage - They have failed to disclose any collaborations with Legal team, KYC+AML providers, IoT producers and also the nature of partnerships with the mentioned partners.
You can find my ratings methodology here- https://medium.com/@krishnenduchatterjee/ico-evaluation-investing-a-vc-perspective-for-investment-over-greedy-short-term-returns-433f6f9e13d8
Agree
-1
-1Disagree
ReportExperts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.