Patron

Not a great team
Not bad vision
Not yet working product

Failed KYC

Update rating:
Team Kyc failed ..... don't have working product yet.
Good great ... Great vision best of luck team

KYC failed by team

Again marketplace... The concept should be more clear
Interesting approach to team but didint pass KYC

It's a good idea. They need to come up with a strong marketing campaign, as there are competitors out there, so they will need to work hard to get this one to be a big success.

English in whitepaper can use some cleaning up. Hire someone folks.

"I am the Japanese entrepreneur who is the only admitted by Facebook founder Mark
Zuckerberg that was born in the same year. "

I have no idea what that means. And it's on the opening page.

I like your idea. I want to especially note the excellent positioning of the project - I see you everywhere: banners, articles, mentions ... It's an excellent marketing!
But it seems to me that your product might be stronger if it had more details and features

A great team, with a good balance between
Updated for no-KYC
Blockchain and Social Media Marketing.
The vision is at the top, with a clear RoadMap and relevant Checkpoints.
The product is repetitive to other ICOs, where a working Company was already working. They have to go "From Zero to Hero", and I hope they will manage to do it!

Team: The Patron advisors have deep experience .
Vision: The White paper is very poorly written
Product: The product doesn't require Blockchain except to market their tokens.

There's advisors, boards and experts in the team, but who are actually doing the work? Hardcap of 35,000,000 is unreasonable for the proposed platform. English version of the whitepaper needs work, but it the project is meant for Asian market, that may be understandable.

Roadmap ends in July, 2018 and by that point GLOBAL SCALE is expected. I am not sold on that, seems planning has not been done.

Solid team with industry and blockchain background. .

My takeaway from going through this - language barrier issues. I see it in the white paper.

Recommend bringing on some additional team members to correct this.

ICO has promise.

This project looks promising. And weird. And that's good, probably.

What did I mean with saying that:
0. Atsushi Hisatsumi is a well known personality, he can deliver and I know that from his track record. That gives all it takes to invest in this ICO, if you are into Atsushi Hisatsumi and/or business on social media influencers. And it is expected to be weird to do business with a personality like Atsushi Hisatsumi.
1. That was one of the worst White Papers I've seen for a long time. It is ugly, inconsistent, unreadable and poorly translated. It looks like a student's odd job. Probably, a bit high student. Many times I was forced to guess, what the author was trying o say.

E.g. WTF does that mean "..., or even purchasing influencer for a year as an advertising tower by closing contract through WEB."? I guess that's Google translate from Japanese, and you wanted to say something like a "billboard", but it is still a painful reading. And do not get me wrong: that's OK to not be a master of foreign language as a person, but it is not OK to show it in your official publications and offerings to investors, while talking about million of USD. Hire a translator and a proofreader, that's just a couple hundreds. And I, as investor, won't be turned down by your presentation right away.

Next, the numbers: there are a lot of numbers in that WP, but most of them either makes no sense or coming out of nowhere and leaving in the unknown direction. What I mean is that "Gross profit transition chart" literally has a lot of numbers with no ground under them, and it's hard not to question it.

And I can go on forever with that WP, it is just a limitless source of flaws and errors. But I assume it was it's point: to prevent any professional investor from engaging, so his curiosity and reasonable attitude won't be a problem to deal with later. They want this to be crazy, so come on board if you up to it. Without me this time, although I will grab a popcorn and watch Patron do great or burn great.

I don’t find the idea new and interesting, as there is a great variety of projects of this type (for example, really popular one – https://www.patreon.com/).
How do you differ and what will be the reason for people to use your platform and not Patreon, with is convenient and popular even without cryptocurrencies?
And it's really inconvenient to watch your site because of fast scrolling

And where is your KYC?

Have to change rating. Idea still good, however CEO not capable of speaking english language.

No international advisors.

KYC failed. Highly unprofessional.