An ecosystem of dermatologists and clinics, apps and acne seems limited in scope but could attract exclusive and wealthy investors who patronize these services. Looking forward to something novel and exciting although the whitepaper needs more refining.

Team - well experienced and educated, key positions appear filled.

Vision - neither website nor WP would load correctly when I tried on safari, team should look into this. After checking WP on chrome, the overwhelming consideration for me was 'is this really the number 1 problem such a strong team should be focussing on?' There is an overwhelming feeling that this is a solution that needs its problem to be more significant than it really is. In the UK, having bad skin is treated by visiting a GP who either prescribes a solution and monitors, or refers to a specialist for more serious cases, who in turn prescribes and monitors. I'd assume it would be the same across developed economies (less the cost at point of service). An issue that has become apparent in the Skype consultancy market is misdiagnosis due to non tactile consult. This leads to increased costs for liability insurance due to increased risks. I'd assume that diagnosis of skin issues would be somewhat hit and miss for potential audience due to the many factors that can undermine a consultation - internet connection, light, image quality, patient dialogue etc. I was surprised to learn the average spend per month would be $75pcm, especially when the 38% market growth for TAM is driven by developing economies consumers (surely lower spend here would take average down?). WP is well explained and considered, but I find the concept undermined by the niche it is focussed on. Tokenomics may imply a price collapse after 12 holding bonus ends, potentially before that with a price point meaning token holding would no longer produce a real bonus in dollar terms.

Product - found and tried MVP, works well.

Good luck to the team with implementation. I really think such a talented team could be better utilised for a more pressing medical issue, but that's just personal opinion.

Commendable the team has the vision to incorporate AI and blockchain into skincare.

It is a space that calls for disruption and using technology to enable the next generation of growth.

The key to business scalability will rest on partnerships in building the ecosystem.

Looking forward to the prototype

Although the scope of this project seems highly limited. It still has the potential to attract niche investors. The whitepaper needs to provide further details. The team comes from a strong background. Waiting for an MVP.

Good novel concept to create a decentralized system for health care providers and patients.

Team is solid and diversified.

Two main issues:
- no mvp apart from wallet. Since they are promising a whole suite of tools and apps I would've like to see at least one working already.
- only 50% of tokens will be sold during ICO and unsold tokens will not be burned.

Interesting seeming project in a relatively untapped space in blockchain, strong looking team. Worth keeping up with. Would like more clear cut product info and see an MVP.

A very interesting project that combines artificial intelligence and blockchain. But ambiguous for investors. It would be interesting to see MVP.
Let's see what will come out of it.

This type of product has very low maketcap, it will be very hard to make any profit out of this. I will wait for their product to see how they will make it profitable.

The project understand the problems in skincare industry we are facing that people don't know the real solutions for their skin. What this project is trying to achieve will totally change how we buy and use skincare products.
Though, this is not the ultimate solution.
AI can lead our technology to further.
$3,000,000 soft cap is reasonable for the project, but compared with this, $37,000,000 of hard cap is too much and I wonder how they allocate those amount of money.
They have necessary advisers to make their dreams come true.

Skin care analysis may not be the most obvious business model to put on the blockchain but as the main reason for doing it is to establish a token-based rewards and incentive program, I think it's ok.

Choosing Ethereum will potentially put a cap on transactions, not knowing exactly where Ethereum is going it may be wise to look at other ledgers that are focused on transaction speed and simplicity.

Strong (and huge) team but very hard to make out how many of the team members and advisors are actually working with the product or are just supporting it.

Tokenomics are, well, different. I have a very hard time supporting a distribution of just 5.5%. This together with the suggested token allocation will most likely keep the price down for years to come.

The indicated, fully distributed, the market cap is of 600-700 MUSD. Too high and simply unrealistic.

I like the team and the vision but OPU needs to do a much better job explaining how this ICO is going to be a good investment for the individual token buyer and potentially revamp their tokenomics and token allocation schedule, what they now have makes little sense.

Alos, I tried the MVP but unfortunately, at the time of this review, it didn’t work.

Disclaimer: Rating and or commentary provided represents my own personal view and is not to be relied upon as advice. I am not a financial advisor nor am I registered in any jurisdiction with any financial services regulator. I provide no recommendations that any offering should be bought, sold or held. Before making financial decisions please undertake your own due diligence and consult a financial advisor.