Ratings MyTVchain

→ Blockchain Advantage - ⛔️
→ White Paper - ✅
→ Team Composition - ✅
→ Token Economics - ✅
→ Business Model - ✅❤️
→ Social Media Presence - ⛔️
→ Collaborations & partnerships - ✅❤️
→ Fund Allocation - ✅
→ Legal Loopholes - ✅
→ MVP/ DApp/ Working Product  - ✅

Advantage - Clear business model and tokenomics. Well done WP! Well established partnerships.

Disadvantage - The technical side is a bit problem. Currently, ETH platform can’t support this kind of a project. Are they building their own hybrid blockchain or using other newer protocols for building it? The tech side is a bit unclear to be honest. Also, the blockchain capability for the team is not visible.

You can find my ratings methodology here- https://medium.com/@krishnenduchatterjee/ico-evaluation-investing-a-vc-perspective-for-investment-over-greedy-short-term-returns-433f6f9e13d8

Thank you for the reply to my concerns, i have updated my rating and review accordingly.

After my review, the team contacted me and explained everything, the good thing that they have also updated their linkedin profiles to mention their relation with the project.

Also such a project with 27K members and 30 clubs including 3 national leagues in France and are now discussing partnerships with US organisations, that means it is a project that will achieve returns sooner than expected and that will create a value for the token in a short time.

Expanding also the business in many countries means that the team behind this project is very positive and serious about what they are doing, most important i can see now the dedication behind it.

Good luck, probably i will invest myself in this token.

Very good idea and concept and by the way a real active company, with active real users and sports clubs which makes a huge difference with other ICOs!

At least a real company with great experienced team, already up and running, very good concept and users/web TVs references...

The vision of the project is a very good one and it could work very well in the future of TV streaming. The Blockchain also can be a good way to encourage the increase of the audience, but also to avoid bogus audience rankings.

The team is well composed and each of them seems to have a good experience behind them in the sectors they come from. Perhaps the figure that is missing is an expert Blockchain developer, to make a leap in quality technology.

Unfortunately, such a project, at the moment can not be developed in Ethereum, as it needs greater scalability, speed, and microscopic fees, given the huge amount of transactions that could take place on such a platform. You can also seriously consider the introduction of Proof of Stake, along with the creation of your own Blockchain or a fork of a Blockchain most suited to your project.

The whitepaper is very well written and there are complete analyzes of the market and of the competitors, problems, solutions and possible benefits of change.

Good luck in the development and fundraising, the project can aspire to success, but with some improvements along the way.

The team displays impressive credentials but have not yet been approved in the KYC process and do not have a consistent digital footprint in the Web.

The vision of a platform that provides a fairer financial remuneration for sport videos producers and clubs (especially small ones) is laudable. The concept seems to have a good potential for success as the PoC at OnePlace2B attracted 5,000 users and generated more than 500,000 video views in a matter of months.

The product described, a content distribution solution integrating CDN with a P2P-based network, while reserving the Ethereum blockchain for the monetization and tracking processes, is challenging but may be an interesting solution to the scaling problem.

Good to see some original ideas and practical ICOs out there. Most of the latest ICOs are just repackaging of older ideas and some of them are even non-practical. This project has good concept they are trying to disrupt one of the fastest growing industry like Pay TV, which is great. This project has good future if executed right.

However many project team members seems new on linkedin. Don't see any Blockchain Architect on the team, which is concerning as this a major blockchain project.

The project started from Q1 2018, but the social media channels are created late 2018 (Sept-Oct). Don't see lot of activity on the channels. There surely needs to be more engagement from active community members to gain traction.

The web platform is live already which is good news, but then why does the project need to raise 35 Million USD ? What are these funds be used for ? Team should provide good explanation on how collected funds would be utilized.

Many project team members are new to linkedin. The developers do not seem to have blockchain experience. Also not sure why the developers are fro, Romania while most of the project team management is in France.

While the concept is good, till the time we don't see t working in the real world, we can't be sure of its success.

While the project has started from Q1 2018, the social media channels have been created only in late 2018 (Sept-Oct). The followers in linkedin and facebook are limited.

The web platform has already been built. Why does the project need to raise USD 35 Million is not clear. How would the funds raised by utilized?