Rated on Jul 17, 2018
Modified on Sep 28, 2018
Good project and team. Interesting product and think it will do well long term as long as there is work on adoption.
This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.
Rated on Jul 18, 2018
This project is intended to mak a high impact change at blockchain. This may great help to lot of non-technology company. However, the soft cap and hard cap is same and soft cap is not a reasonable. This will decrease the attraction of project.
Rated on Aug 9, 2018
The biggest team ever I have ever seen on ICOBench for a single project. Solid and strong.
The concept and vision is good too as it can be a champion to bring the blockchain to a higher level with Mainnet launched already. Another good point.
MVP is good too. Congrats.
The only thing that I am concerned is the softcap and hardcap is the same
Rated on Jul 11, 2018
Modified on Jul 18, 2018
Team is big good and experienced.... Vision is not bad at all But with this kind of token economy it will be hard to raise funds.
About mvp... mvp is not ready yet ......
update rating : found MVP
Rated on Sep 26, 2018
MetaHash has a big team and having Ian Balina as their advisor greatly increases their chance to success and credibility.
I downloaded #MetaGate from the MVP website and I tested it. Looks good! Congrats!
Having the same amount on Soft Cap and Hard Cap is unusual, but I believe it ensures that they just want to develop this project and that is the fixed amount they need, instead of focusing on making profit.
The White Paper is investor friendly, it explains the problems and solutions, technology and many other aspects related to this ICO.
To be honest, after reading more about this project, I am really excited to see it in action. Good luck!
Rated on Aug 11, 2018
Solid and strong and big team.
The concept and vision looks good too. Interesting product and think it will do well long term as long as there is work on adoption.
MVP is good as well. best of luck team.
Rated on Jul 4, 2018
MetaApps is attempting to build the evolution of Smart Contracts this in very ambitious. If it works it can be used to decentralize any service. These will be independent programs that can exist forever and do not belong to anyone. Will be interested to see when They work exactly as programmed and cannot be tampered with by third parties.
Rated on Jul 12, 2018
Modified on Jul 17, 2018
KYC Complete, Good team member and experienced . Vision also good and effective.
Need to work with token economy.
Have MVP in Desktop version. Mobile app coming soon.
Best of luck for team and this project.
Update: After talking with one team member I change my rating. Thanks Andrey for sharing.
Rated on Jul 14, 2019
The whitepaper is clear and well written. Allowing coin holders to earn extra MHC (native token) by staking tokens in their wallets or through forging (mining) or delegation, is a strong concept.
I tested all 3 out over a period of 2 weeks and they appear to work as intended. The lightening fast transaction speeds were impressive. They claim 50,000 TPS on their website. I do not have the ability to test that claim, however when I sent transactions over the network they were processed and appeared in the receiving wallet within 2 seconds of sending it.
Challenges. They are a another blockchain project that is entering into a very crowded field of blockchain projects. They have built what I consider to be one of the best blockchain platforms that I have ever seen. However marketing seems to be lagging behind. It is not enough to build a great product if no one knows about it.
Many Investors who bought into the crowdsale are understandably unhappy because the price is down over 69% from its ICO price.
Increased visible marketing efforts and communication with the community is one area that can be improved. That said the fact that they are laser focused on building a good product right now is actually a positive. The logic of wanting to have a good solid platform before you bring people on it is not a bad one. However the platform in my opinion is at a point where they can start ramping up their marketing efforts.
The second issue is the size of the team. I counted 51 people on the team and just one adviser. This ratio is substantially off.
At a minimum there should be 3 advisers, covering marketing, technology and other key areas such as compliance.
There are 3 CEOs listed on the team and one co-founder. Looking at the organizational structure its hard to determine who is doing what. However it seems that with so many people on the team they could allocate more resources to marketing and to community management within their key social platforms like Telegram.
Technical support and documentation is outstanding and very responsive. They have regular work hours where you can get answers to your questions quickly and the support turnaround times are on average 15 minutes.
Overall I think this is a very solid project. Standing out among the crowded sea of blokchain projects will require strong smart marketing efforts as well as key strategic partnerships. Better communication with community members, and efficient and effective allocation of human capital will also be critical to the long term success of the project.
This is not financial advice. I am not a financial advisor. Do your own research and make your own investment decisions. Investing in ICOs is highly risky and speculative. If you invest be prepared to lose your entire investment.
Rated on Aug 26, 2018
Modified on Aug 26, 2018
Super strong team - amazing progress on development already - lots of activities on the github! Superb social media community and active participation. Solid white-paper and loved the concept of decentralisation for real time application platform. Definitely going to put my money on this project.
Rated on Oct 5, 2018
Ambitious project with working mvp. Team is large but as mentioned by others, would like to see more credibility in their accreditation of their coin.
Rated on Jul 10, 2018
Modified on Jul 29, 2018
Hardcap is huge for such project.
Only 12% of tokens are distributed on ICO.
But they have an MVP and they will release a mobile app soon.
Rated on Aug 13, 2018
Modified on Aug 13, 2018
First i tried to get a link directly from Finma or any official document that verifies the claims about finma recognition to this coin, but only found press releases on $10 websites. We need a proof for that.
Second thing most of the team is from russian continentz and the company is in switzerland? It raises big red glag seems a way to create a credibility to establish a company in switzerland, also having Ian Balina on the team does not make it look good, cause we all know that he gets paid to talk good about projects, he even admitted that himself several times over social media and then again denying but many ICOs went screaming when they paid him and he did not deliver, but that team and such a humongous hard cap is really too much, i can build another microsoft with that money. I do not find any value also behind the project itself, and it will need long long time if any companies would adopt such technology, cause we already have ripple in the market creating joint ventures with banks, and still yet the value not increasing, so how about this new tech in the market. I see this as a long term investment with a very high risk, i would personally not invest there. And it seems the market is getting a flood of these new blockchains with claims of faster speed in transactions, well emails are also fast in transactions, but they are full of spam too, so it is not only to have something fast, but something reliable and secure, take for example what happened to parity when millions disappeared in ethereum. Well this tech must be checked by credible 3rd parties , and a patent must be acquired proving the claims before i believe that this is something reliable and solid, you must start at least in connecting with big tech companies and patent organizations and start proving proof of how reliable this tech is.
The market does not need speed now, it needs something different.
It all sounds too good to be true in my opinion,
Rated on Aug 9, 2018
Exciting and ambitious project. Love to see an ICO already launching with a MainNet. A bit concerned about the large raise...
My rating is also conditional on the FINMA approval being confirmed - which I am still trying to do (emailed them). The link on the #MetaHash website does not direct anywhere...
Rated on Oct 25, 2018
"The fastest crypto-currency in the world" seems like a good way to place your future product. Their WhitePaper explains pretty well their plan to make this happen and I am a bit excited to see how the actual market will react to this on the long run.
Rated on Jul 13, 2018
Modified on Jul 13, 2018
Hardcore team. Five million transactions a day is no mean feat. A solid well-laid out ecosystem from a far-reaching vision. The road map is underway and it seems they have a good start.
Rated on Aug 8, 2018
Great technology application and great vision i would say. It is a head above the rest of the so call fastest transaction chain that seem to be the norm thing now.
Why is softcap and hardcap the same?
Good team, and kyc pass
Rated on Dec 29, 2018
Modified on Jan 12, 2019
- 50,000 transactions per second, no more than three seconds. That is very great.
- I like AI. AI can help very much for the world.
- Great vision. Their ambitions are great. The Fastest Crypto-currency in the World.
- MVP is available and already testnest by months of high-stress load tests. This is proof for serious work.
- Team strong.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.