Havven is a decentralised payment network and stablecoin designed to enable everyday cryptocurrency purchases. The network reduces price volatility through its dual-token system: HAV, the collateral token, and nUSD, the asset-backed stablecoin. nUSD is collateralised by the value of HAV, and the value of HAV comes from transaction fees that are generated with all nUSD transactions and paid to HAV holders. The value of nUSD is kept stable by HAV holders, who are incentivised to manage its supply. Havven is currently on Ethereum but will also be on EOSIO by the end of 2018.
Havven is a decentralised payment network designed to enable everyday cryptocurrency purchases. The network utilises a dual token system to reduce price volatility. The fees from transactions within the system are used to collateralise the network. The collateral is secured by the blockchain enabling the creation of a new asset-backed stablecoin, nomin tokens. Each transaction will generate fees that are paid to havven token holders. As transaction volume grows, the value of the platform increases and active participants are rewarded with increased transaction fees. This permissionless, low-fee, and stable payment network will enable anyone anywhere to transact with anyone else. Join us in creating the future of money.
All ratings published on ICObench serve informational purposes only. ICObench does not provide investment forecast, recommendations or any consulting for that matter. Thus, neither ICObench, nor the experts can be hold responsible for the visitors’ investment decisions. Read more
The WP looks like 20 pages with theoretical and technical description of the product itself, but practically nothing about marketing and competitive analyses, financials and business planning. So it does not look like real whitepaper, most likely it looks like some part of somebody’s scientific theses... the site also looks raw. The team looks great for sure, but advisors should be added. Guys, here in the ICO world we are already used to some minimal “standards” of “packing” the projects, why you almost totally do not comply? What about MVP? It not enough to draw some scientific pictures to claim 30 mln hardcap.
ICO Advisor | ICO Consulting | Project Review |MBA Finance and Strategy |9+ Years of Corporate Experience | Crypto Trading and Investing Rated on Feb 18, 2018
4
3
3
7%
No doubt the project has been able to generate steam through their strong social presence but the product and vision seems to be just another project in the crowded space. The key differentiator in such projects remains the clear execution strategy for mass adoption, which is missing and has to be worked upon.
Blockchain Advisor, Blockchain Expert, ICO Investor, Product Manager, Project Manager, Business Analyst, Trader, Lecturer, Jack of All Trades Rated on Jun 28, 2018
4
5
4
6%
This project came when we desperately needed stable cryptocurrencies. Everyone already knows that Tether is risky. And Maker was not liquid as well. It has been good to have another solid stablecoin.
ICO Analyst, Advisor & Investor Rated on Feb 28, 2018
4
3
4
6%
What is missing here is a clear execution strategy. The whitepaper seems like only a theoretical explanation of their product but neglects the business side of the project. Something which each project without a doubt should have.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.
