About GCOX
Our primary customers are intended to be celebrities. GCOX provides solutions for each celebrity from every stage in the celebrity life cycle. A celebrity life cycle begins from the introduction stage, followed by the stages of growth, maturity, and decline, before reaching the final decision point. Regardless of the stage a celebrity is in, GCOX has the solution to meet his or her needs.
For example, celebrities in the Introduction and Growth stages could leverage on the GCOX platform to promote, enhance, and expand their popularity. GCOX will address celebrities’ needs through its ITS platforms for fundraising, as well as their access campaign platforms to promote their outreach and brand to fans as well as the masses.
GCOX offers a platform that uses blockchain technology to create and trade Celebrity Tokens. This enables celebrities to unlock the value of their popularity by creating and selling their own Celebrity Tokens on the GCOX Platform. Fans will be able to gain privileged access to their idols by purchasing Celebrity Tokens of their idols. The listings of Celebrity Tokens on exchanges will provide an objective indication of their popularity, seen through the market capitalisation of their Celebrity Tokens as determined by open market forces.
The utilisation of these Celebrity Tokens depends on the potential and promise of the celebrities concerned, the size of the community on the platform, the degree of user activity and market acceptance, as well as the participant's choice of potential projects.
While celebrities who list their popularity on the platform will have their own personal Celebrity Tokens, the ACCLAIM Token is the native token of the platform. It can be used to access all the celebrities listed on the platform. In fact, there are various advantages in using ACCLAIM Tokens to access the listed celebrities, such as subscription bonus for an end-user if he or she used ACCLAIM Tokens to access campaigns or initiatives put forth by listed celebrities.
Whitepaper
Missing whitepaper? Let us know.
Ratings

Rated on Aug 6, 2018
Modified on Sep 14, 2018
Personally, I know some of the investors and advisors. Extremely experienced in scaling up fast with big monies.
Unfortunately, only one out of all the advisors has a LinkedIn profile. This is a serious flag. Either the team does not believe in profiling their advisors properly or these advisors do not even know about this project?
Please correct me if I am wrong. I am most willing to review my rating if shown otherwise.

Rated on Aug 3, 2018
Modified on Aug 5, 2018
Looks like a strong and numerous team but I have to agree with Paul's comments below. The WP is clearly written but lacks business planning data. So I recommend to improve it. Also the MVP link should be attached


Rated on Aug 5, 2018
Modified on Aug 29, 2018
Very strong team and backers that will power through any current obstacles. The concept requires extremely good execution, funding and drive to realise. This, I see in the team.
Edit: revising rate as no attempt is made to address any concerns here.. this is weird. Expected more.

Rated on Aug 10, 2018
About team :
VESI KERTIKOVA she didnt add GCOX in her work profile
Philip Wong have very poor LinkedIn profile.
Brandon Low have also very poor LinkedIn Profile
Ray Heng have also the same Situation.
Core team is localized team first of all dont find many Advisers LinkedIn Profile. And We know Celebrity dont work they just endorsement the project thats it ..... Dont have any kind of MVP this is just an Concept. Also this is not the first there are Competition on the Market. And I dont blv to Invest in any Concepts...... Marketing plan, Financial Plan, Product planning , investment over view doc is missing in WP.

Rated on Jul 31, 2018
GCOX is the world's first blockchain-powered platform that allows the popularity of celebrities to be tokenised and listed. They have a strong team with people having huge experience in the industry.
*This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.

Rated on Aug 29, 2018
Team is strong but Not really solving any real world problems. It is a very interesting idea but totally dependent on Celebrity endorsement of the project. Best of luck team. Hopefully, they will be able to capture really good celebrities to come on board. Best of luck team!!

Rated on Aug 13, 2018
Big team members and advisor board, but some team members and advisors linked in profile missing. Will suggest to update this. Vision is clear but how to achieve the vision is not mentioned in enough details. WP needs to improvement about Business plan, Marketing plan. I don't find MVP for me it's in concept level.
Looking forward to see the MVP and will Change my rating. Best of luck team.

Rated on Aug 14, 2018
Modified on Aug 14, 2018
Honestly, I don't believe that all stated celebrities take part in this project. So far it looks like a scam for investors. Show proofs that all these stars really are investors. I want to see a video with them saying that it is true. As a last resort, on which blog can we read that they really are investors? Also I see that the end of ICO is in 17 days, but I don't see a powerful community, a normal product and etc. Maybe I am mistaken, and therefore I will wait for real confirmations, but not just words.

Rated on Aug 7, 2018
Im passionate fan of Pacman.
This project has invited a lot of big names, so it seems that success is realistic.
But when I read the white paper, this looks like a strange project to me.
First of all, there is no concept of softcap, the number of sales schedule is huge, but there is no stepwise setting that should fluctuate depending on the procurement amount. There is no valid MVP.
Also, although prominent investors are presented, the amount of investment does not seem to be included in any calculation against the progress of the project.
Celebrities are already getting various considerations by existing SNS.
Are they not thinking about the possibility of collapsing the position that they have built up so far?

Rated on Aug 2, 2018
Modified on Aug 5, 2018
Team - too many core team and advisors who are unverifiable via LinkedIn. Some advisors have less than perfect reputations in the industry. I'm a tad surprised that HH Bin Zayed Al Nayan would allow himself to be listed here given the vociferous protection of his privacy in the UAE. Somewhat of a red flag. I'll also use some of my contacts to see if Michael Owen has invested in this project, just to be certain of the legitimacy of him being posted here.
Vision - Not the first attempt to leverage the 'fandom', not even using blockchain tech. I don't see where the value in this comes from. Celebrities have minimal f-2-f time with fans for a reason, namely to promote the exclusivity that comes with being a celebrity. Giving people the chance to realise they're just like you and I destroys the status of the cult of celebrity. This project appears to destroy the industry it is looking to monetise. I don't see any reason why a celebrity would want to be involved here, when they pay people (agents) to gatekeep their interactions with their fans in the first place.
Product - no MVP, even though a platform would be relatively easy to implement and they already have celebrities on board, according to the WP.
Something about this doesn't ring true with me. Good luck to the team implementing the project, but it's definitely not one for me.

appreciate your comments and we will continue to improve the project.
Most of our team's linkedin profiles are up on the web and under the news and media section, there are a lot of pictures, videos and news articles that feature our celebrities as well as our advisors, including HH Bin Zayed Al Nayan.
these are some links from reputable sources that could verify GCOX's legitimacy.
https://www.arabianbusiness.com/banking-finance/395671-deal-signed-for-uaes-first-celebrity-tokens-crypto-exchange
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/21/michael-owen-former-england-footballer-joining-cryptocurrency-space.html
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-21/crypto-craze-sees-singapore-firm-tapping-sports-stars-for-tokens
Hope these information could strengthen our credibility and also improve your rating towards our project.
cheers!

Rated on Aug 6, 2018
GCOX’s idea of tokenizing celebrity popularity through blockchain is an interesting concept.
Though the team is strong, I believe that they need a strong actionable business plan. The whitepaper says that they already have multiple celebrities on board with the idea. It would be interesting to see how this platform fares in the near future.

Rated on Aug 30, 2018
Modified on Aug 30, 2018
White Paper - The white paper is quite clear about the objectives but lacks a clear roadmap related to advantages for investors and strong business plan post ICO. The benefits that investors gain from investing in this token are not clear.
Team - The team composition is filled with heavy hitters but then again most of them don’t have clear commitments to the project as evident from their LI. Makes me a skeptic about the objective of doing a private-sale and ICO, without a MVP after so much investments/ commitments.
Tokenomics - The token distribution is clearly stated and also the utilization of proceeds seems reasonable. No Soft Cap or Hard Cap, just a bunch of Scenario in pitch deck! As an investor quite troublesome to believe on the valuation of Tokens.
Business Model - Having Michael Owen & Manny Pacquiao amongst others as their celebrity is quite appealing but it would have been much better if this ICO stated that they have acquired these celebrity on the platform (and verified by the celebrities themselves) rather than as brand ambassadors (which seems the most likely case). Any clarifications would help!
MVP/ DApp/ Working Product  - Due to the absence of any working product/ MVP the ICO represents more of an idea than an actual reality.

Rated on Aug 8, 2018
Very questionable team, found multiple advisors with questionable reputation within the community. Vision is a bit clearer, but yet we have seen multiple projects that have tried it. Could be that this project could actually pull this off, but I fail to believe in it personally and I would have to see a strong alpha version of the project working right before I do.

Rated on Aug 8, 2018
Amazing to see that you guys has teamed up a big number of celebs and millionaires and even billionaires as early investors. But I wonder why you still need this ICO? This is one of my big question.
WP is well written but it is not clear to me on how to get ROI for investors and how to engage celebs? Another point is that you distribute 80% of tokens without any softcap and hardcap. This unsettled milestones make investors worried of their investment as the ICO can last forever until all tokens are sold. I myself don’t have a peace of mind when thinking to invest in the project.
MVP is not available so it is hard to assess the product.

Rated on Aug 20, 2018
Lots of warning signs on this one. Most notably the celebrity and millionaire endorsements. We need to see proof of this! It wouldnt be the first time a savvy unscrupulous company used famous people's names to gain legitimacy and scam investors.
No MVP available either. This seems to be a case of a company trying to cash in from the wave of ICO's that are happening. If they have so much celebrity backers, they surely dont need to do an ICO?

Rated on Aug 6, 2018
It is a very interesting idea.
By utilizing this we can cheer celebrities in a true sense.
There will be demand for both celebrities as well as civilians.

Rated on Aug 7, 2018
Modified on Aug 7, 2018
The difficulty with business models like that is to really attract celebrities. Without reach there will be no benefit for the celebrities to register. And without enough celebrities there won't be enough reach.
Do you have any LOIs of people that want to join?

Rated on Aug 5, 2018
It all goes down to how desirable the token will be. My assumption is that if the token will be used it will be mainly used be from celebrities that their reputation is declining or they were never really famous at the first place

Rated on Aug 1, 2018
Modified on Aug 9, 2018
Such an innovative idea which puts fandom to good use, monetizing it. I see a very competent team, a well-written whitepaper, and the road map looks well planned. What remains to be done - the nitty gritty. Take care to get the ICO well-publicized as that's the key for success of your ICO.

Rated on Aug 21, 2018
Modified on Aug 21, 2018
Team is good, but there are few things lacking in project.
MVP should be added, important question how company will convince celebrities ? and project is totally based on use by celebrities

Rated on Aug 6, 2018
GCOX made it possible to interact with celebrities. Currently, we have SNS like Twitter, but thee are so many hates and celebrities won't be willing to communicate with fans on it. Monetizing interaction with celebrities through blockchain address the problem.

Rated on Aug 27, 2018
I believe it's a challenging proposition. Maybe it would have worked in ICO 1 a couple of months ago, but today there has to be a clearer business model than I could find in the project material. Suggest work more on those items. Best of luck.

Rated on Jul 31, 2018
Modified on Oct 23, 2018
Would be interesting to see crypto celebrity on their platform. The product development will be relatively easier since they already have celebrity such Manny Pacquiao as their investor already.

Rated on Aug 5, 2018
Seems like this project has some heavy hitters backing it. I actually wonder why do they even need to do an ICO when they have multimillionaires and billionaires among their investors. WP is written well but doesn't clarify business planning. Will have to see MVP to be able to better rate this.

Rated on Aug 23, 2018
I just don't see this being a need. The team seems to be decent but I just find it hard to see the need for such a product either that or the project was not fully explained properly. I am in the influencer marketing space and have invested in many influencers and just don't see them utilizing such a thing. Personally I think it's just a quick raise money scheme and then see what to do with money after.

Rated on Aug 22, 2018
For this ICO to succeed it would have to first reach celebrities, then educate celebrities on the token and blockchain, then convince them that this platform is preferable to other merchandising/marketing arrangements (assuming they don't already have contracts for these things), and finally educate and funnel fans into the platform. I don't see this project working, even though it has gargantuan egos on its side.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.
Press Releases
Blog

Financial
Token info
Investment info
Milestones
Idea and Founder's
Team Formation.
Conceptualisation and
development of
GCOX Exchange.
Formed
Advisory Board.
Conceptualisation and
development of
GCOX Blockchain,
Acclaim.
Conceptualisation and
development of
GCOX App.
Signed our First
Celebrity, Manny
Pacquiao.
Start of Private
Placement Sales.
Commencement of
PR Campaigns .
Event Launch with AListers
Celebrities,
Launch of Acclaim
Blockchain, Public Sale
of ACM*.
Release of ACM
Tokens and Launch of
GCOX Exchange*.
Launch of
Celebreneur,CelebConnect
and CelebCharity*.