Youngwhan "Nick" LeeICO team member replied on 9 Feb 2019
Ratings
All ratings published on ICObench serve informational purposes only. ICObench does not provide investment forecast, recommendations or any consulting for that matter. Thus, neither ICObench, nor the experts can be hold responsible for the visitors’ investment decisions. Read more
Clemen Chiang
Ph.D. | CEO | FinTech in Stocks | Blockchain in Cryptos | Author of Amazon Best Sellers in Online Trading
Rated on Nov 1, 2018
Modified on Feb 13, 2019
Rated on Nov 1, 2018
Modified on Feb 13, 2019
3
3
3
19%
Key founders did not complete the KYC process. Serious flag and warrants remedial action.
If the team responds, I will be willing to revise rating after KYC passed.
All the best!
~~~~~~~~~
Youngwhan "Nick" Lee
ICO team member replied on 9 Feb 2019
Hello Clemen,
FYI, the founders at EcoVerse has done the KYC and all passed. Could you please update your rating? Thanks in advance.
Nick.
~~~~~~~~~
Dear Nick
Great that the core two members have passed the KYC.
1. Financial → The hard cap you're raising is US$175 million??? Is this number stated correctly under Financial?
2. Milestones → There is NOT a single mention on your product development other than sales?
3. Team → Who are your advisors guiding you through the ICO process?
I hope that the team takes a committed approach to updating key and relevant information for the community to understand your project.
All the best!
+1Agree
-2
-3Disagree
Report
James Sowers
Ico adviser
Rated on Nov 13, 2018
Rated on Nov 13, 2018
1
1
1
17%
No KYC passed and no links to social media or LinkedIn profiles. Hudge sign of a poor or even worse scam project /No way to assess team's experience, expertise or education. Cannot definitively say anyone listed is connected to the project. Red flag.
Agree
-1
-1Disagree
Report
Paul Cliffe
ICO advisor|Crypto-asset and ICO investor| Libertarian|CEO of Block Venture Project
Rated on Aug 4, 2018
Rated on Aug 4, 2018
1
2
1
16%
Team - no KYC passed and no links to social media or LinkedIn profiles. No way to assess team's experience, expertise or education. Cannot definitively say anyone listed is connected to the project. Red flag.
Vision - confusing and under informative. 2 currencies - one asset backed tether and the other a 'trading' currency. Why? Sentences such as 'various techniques are used to secure the network' hardly inspire confidence. This seems more like an article on how AI backed PoC could work as opposed to PoW or PoS. But there is little here to give the sense it is a worthwhile token to hold. No tokenomics, no business plan, no competitive analysis, no target market.
Product - no product, no MVP, no anything here to show proof of concept even.
+1Agree
-2
-3Disagree
Report
David ShinICO team member replied on 9 Aug 2018
Tamas Peter Turcsán ⚙️
Strategist @ Inlock.io
Rated on Nov 14, 2018
Modified on Nov 14, 2018
Rated on Nov 14, 2018
Modified on Nov 14, 2018
2
2
1
6%
Poor prepration for ICO.
Confused vision.
Weak website.
Most of the advisory team does not have Linkedin profile.
No product. No MVP.
Red flags everywhere.
Agree
0
Disagree
Report
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.