Rated on Oct 26, 2018
Modified on Oct 29, 2018
With all my respect the team should be reinforced to reach the project`s targets. A few consultants as “advisors” is not enough to create globally “the platform with secure transactions and escrow service”. The whitepaper contains a long description of the “product” with no numbers. Competitive analysis and business planning approach should be added here for sure. As it a highly competitive area. Or it is not accepted as a paper related to investments/fundraising. Not able to check MVP as it is locked - will improve if i see it, but anyway it should be open to public.
Rated on Oct 28, 2018
I think the number of technical/engineer background people in this team is a little too small if they want to pull off a project like this. Unless they are hiring an external tech team.. the roadmap looks decent but definitely want to see more updates/progress from the team during this period even during their sales.
Rated on Nov 8, 2018
I don't see enough expertise from the blockchain team yet. There is a risk after the fees not to implement the project. Quite a lot of similar projects.
Rated on Nov 1, 2018
The team size is too small. Greatly recommended to increase it in order to successfully implement this project.
Aside from this, the project seems promising.
Rated on Sep 18, 2018
Modified on Sep 18, 2018
What the project is trying to accomplish is huge, but by integrating the four services into one platform, it will maximize the convenience for users and investors. I think that this "convenience" keyword is very useful for sorting out the most powerful ones among the frequent ICOs. Nobody wants to use services that require complicated procedures and work.
I can mention that the team is international and rich in expertise in various fields.
Inviting the owner of DAO to its own platform, the business construction of the project is precise. Many ICO projects remain concerned about long-term possession, but this project shows usefulness for long-term possession.
Rated on Nov 7, 2018
Good business team but need some more blockchain experts as this project is Technology heavy!
I see many new terms and algorithm in the whitepaper but offering same things already been tried by many projects.
Market is saturated with this kind of concept of safe and secure transactions based on smart contracts. Need to think something better!
Rated on Feb 20, 2019
Crypt ON has a lot on their plate. They plan to use their blockchain-based peer-to-peer platform to provide users with access to secure trades, obtain loans, and carry out cryptocurrency-fiat exchanges while eliminating the need for intermediaries completely. The vision of the project aims to tackle important issues that affect the everyday investor.
The only problem I noticed is that the project team is too small. I believe that for them to successfully provide all the services their project has outlined; it would do them a world of good if they added more team members with enough industry experience.
Rated on Oct 15, 2018
I think that one product is a representative example that brings lots of synergies.
What they are trying to realize is very difficult, but I'm sure they will be successful as there are excellent members.
Rated on Nov 14, 2018
This project if and when developed and implemented accurately, will be very convenient to all its users. By putting to good use the four services this is offering we will see how very useful this entire project will be. I’ve noticed also that it has already created some ripples in the cryptoworld, and it has gained a good following on social media channels too. An MVP is available, and also a good team that has good knowledge in their fields and I believe they can accomplish their roadmap.
Rated on Oct 25, 2018
The hardest thing about doing business is to know how reliable a person you are.
This is an important matter in financing and conducting sales transactions.
Platforms that secure "trust" will be in demand all over the world.
Rated on Oct 31, 2018
The team is rather small but they do have an MVP. This looks like an interesting project, however I would greatly recommend you guys to enhance your team to successfully implement it.
Rated on Oct 29, 2018
Disclaimer: This is not a due-diligence of the above mentioned project/company or shows a method measuring the viability of this idea in the market or an investment proposal to the project. My review is not intended to be a source for advice. My review is not using any methodology to decide if the project is a scam or operates any other shady scheme. This is a project review pointing out mostly on incorporation of different technologies. I used published information on ICObench and project links. I was not financially compensated in any way for posting this review. The opinions expressed are my own and are based on my observations while reading the white paper and published project’s information.*//
Rated on Oct 30, 2018
Modified on Oct 30, 2018
I am satisfied with the team, additionally they will be reinforced by external team that is plus.
Mutiple things in a single project but yes they have working product and i took overview of that, seems fine as per my expectation i am sure they are going to expand it.
Roadmap and WP is quite good just want to see few more updates in Roadmap and WP.
Big vision requires big amount of efforts, looking same from this project.
Best of luck
Rated on Nov 1, 2018
Has an MVP. Positive +
Nice hype. 17k on telegram and 8k on twitter. Positive +
Nice token terms. 77% of tokens are allocated to contributors. Hardcap is $16 million which is OK. Positive +
Roadmap started in December 2016. Positive +
Team and advisors are not very experienced in this field. Some of them are even not very experienced at all. I wonder if there may be some information missing on their Linkedin profiles. Negative -
There were so many similar projects and they failed. It may be a bias but I think it will be very difficult for blockchain-based freelancer platforms will succeed unless they are backed by some VCs. You might reply saying that you are more than a freelancer platform. You may be right but I guess this would be your main objective. Negative -
Poor website and paper design. Negative -
In overall, I weren't able to give you higher scores. Sorry guys. Hope I'm wrong and you will become really successful.
Rated on Oct 31, 2018
I met Paul and the team at Futurama and was instantly impressed. This group of highly skilled individuals know how to delegate and execute at the right place and the right time. The platform they are creating is going to be a next level p2p lending service that can benefit it's entire public base. On top of that, they will be able to generate new users from their freelancing platform creating an ecosystem of talented individuals that can flourish in the crypto space. I'm going to continue following this project and keeping up with their progress. Great work so far, keep it up!
Rated on Dec 31, 2018
multiservice p2p platform to provide safe and secure transactions based on smart contracts. Besides the escrow service, the Crypt-ON ecosystem includes a p2p lending service, a crypto freelance marketplace and a p2p local crypto-exchange.
Rated on Nov 19, 2018
Modified on Nov 19, 2018
It seems too complicated as a startup, not a very clear vision for what they can do the best.
1.The MVP is one page with a diagram,not convincing at all;
2.From Github, I saw smartcontract update for crowdsale days ago, but seems it was revised from the codes written several months ago, I am not sure if it is a bad thing;
3.Telegram group seems ok, most of the conversations is about the ICO (including some who care about MVP).
Generally I would rather wait to see.
Rated on Oct 31, 2018
Modified on Feb 19, 2019
Disclaimer: Rating and or commentary provided represents my own personal view and is not to be relied upon as advice. I am not a financial advisor nor am I registered in any jurisdiction with any financial services regulator. I provide no recommendations that any offering should be bought, sold or held. Before making financial decisions please undertake your own due diligence and consult a financial advisor.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.