Clash&GO

Good team and good idea. The fact that AR will be used here is great. I feel that AR will be used more commonly in the game industry as time progresses. Also the rewarding features is a good idea, it will promote game play and it will help in the end.

Strong team members will make the project a success. However, you need to diversify your team further to bring it to higher level.

Good vision and this must be a fun game. One thing that makes me feel concerned of this token is its internal use and its price. Even though it is limited but $1.8 PreICO or $3 for ICO is making investors concerned if not offering a great plan ahead and big exchanges to be listed.

This team is well established in the space and I have met a couple of their members from another project they are developing. It's interesting to see an established company expanding their blockchain and token sale operations & offerings on a per-game basis. I think this is quite a smart way to grow a business.

This particular game seems quite generic and while the strategy is sound, the vision could be expanded to more exciting offerings that will capture the imagination of the gaming community. The tokenomics might present a slight challenge in the secondary market - on exchanges.

Having an MVP, and a well-established dev team working on the product makes it worthwhile to look at.

DISCLAIMER: This is not investment advice.

This looks like a fun game from a experienced company. AR will likely be in some of the best games going forward and tokenization of the rewards and point in the game will enhance play. The strategy of burning tokens is interesting. Overall, nothing Earth shattering, but looks great.

Clash&GO has a big and good team, with very good advisors as well.

They have an already established company which is already a plus.

They have an MVP here: https://ico.clashgo.com/mvp
and they promise that in the conferences they are you can give it a try.

I like the low soft & hard cap, means that they do not try to raise a lot of money for no reason, but psychologically speaking, I would prefer the price lower than 3$.

DISCLAIMER: This is not an investment advice.

Team, product and strategy are sound. Experienced teams always help in the industry as well as well rounded group of advisors.

Success would rely on the adoption of the game and a large userbase. Comforting knowing the team is experienced, but would be better if I knew more about the other games and the publisher behind the game. Publishers ICO may make more sense as many games can be onbaorded and the cross-implementation of virtual in-game items. Limiting blockchain project to one game may have long term issues.

Although you may argue that the use of blockchain technology is not of interest in games I beg to differ. The opportunity to develop in-game rewards and incentives as well as the possibility to build an eco-system between games and platforms is reason enough. Utilizing blockchain technology to do this is no different from handling any other transaction, outside of gaming. Most tend to agree nowadays that transactions will, in the future, be on blockchains. So, why not gaming?

Clash & GO combines several features that I (and many with me) appreciate in a mobile-game. Adding on the city-building features of popular, classic, mobile games like Clash of Clans and Farmville with AR-features to provide a Pokémon style experience, Clash & GO could very well become the next big thing in mobile gaming.

The team is no doubt experienced; many team-members have previously been involved in well-known gaming projects. It’s hard to say exactly what they have achieved withing blockchain, but given the limited use of DLT in the game (initially) I’m not too worried about that.

The price of the token is too high. It’s likely that private pre-sales have been negotiated at considerably lower prices and that will hurt the token when it hits the market. Short- to mid-term it’s hard to see how an investor in the public ICO willl be able to trade their coins at or above ICO-price.

The game looks great, vision is not bad, and I have no doubt that the team will deliver. But, the token price has to be adjusted to reality and put in line with today's market and expectations.

One of the better teams I've seen in the space, in terms of related skillset and experience to what they're building. Plenty of AR and gaming experience around.

There's nothing too exciting around the vision, seems a fairly run of the mill mobile game with some ok tokenomics to it. But overall, not bad.