Bountie

"Bountie’s platform will allow gamers to create their profiles, store their gaming stats, and also find suitable team members and players to practice and play with."

How many players are currently onboard the Bountie's platform?

Great Vision! Good luck guys!

Big Team. Not to many well know advisors and not too much detail about the project.

Good and decent team, more international members would be great.

Appreciate the KYC approval.

Gaming may have challenges in blockchain in current time. However, gaming was the first to adopt blockchain even in 2013.

Good concept. Strong team with experienced advisors. KYC Done.

Vision is clear. BOUNTIE create a new idea with Game+AI+Blockchain for regular gamer. Long time business policy.. it will be hard to raise funds. Wish them to get the proper success.

I love traditional gaming. I am not a huge fan of moving gaming onto the blockchain at this point in time due to scalability and speed issues. However I do like the concept of allowing regular gamers to compete against other regular gamers to earn prizes. The team looks capable and they have a very strong advisory team. I would like to see this project succeed. Best of luck to the team.

This is not financial advice or a recommendation to invest in this or any other ICO. Investors must perform their own due diligence and not rely on external ratings to make their final investment decisions. ICOs are risky and 100% loss of capital is possible.

Realistic hard caps.
At the moment it seems that the block chain does not function properly for the project. Is the block chain used only for tokens and security?
It is profitable for users, but I wonder if there is growth in profit as investors.

Team: Linkedin profile of co-founder "Jose He" leads to error, which is very strange. Team member and advisers have good experience in Blockchain and ICO, however, I see very few team members have gaming industry experience.

Vision: Vision is clear, but there is no mission and objectives on how vision will be achieved.

Product: It is an innovative product for the consumers of gaming industry, however, I do not see much return for investors in gaming industry.


Disclaimer: This is an independent review on the ICO, and does not lead to investment advice. ICOs are risky, kindly do your own research before invesment.

It hurts me to say that this project is not going too far. I know that the motto “Play video games and win money” is appealing for gamers but i feel that the team has too high expectations that cannot be fulfilled. Creating such a project requires the collaboration and the coordination of many parties. This is non achievable from a not well known company like bountie.
Nevertheless I admire the effort

The idea behind is clear and already running in the regular professional gamers field. Difficult to see great advantages with the implementation of blockchain in the project. Strong team and KYC passed.

Though the team looks solid, I doubt if they have experience in blockchain technology. Besides, a large user base is needed for this product to be successful which is not easy to develop. All the best!

I feel the team's strong. As opposed to a lot of other industries, I feel this particular industry (ths problem solving for this industry) doesn't need exceptional business or blockchain or ICO experience. And for that, the board of advisors well cover the gap. It's SIngapore! I'm assuming the gaming experience is covered, too. Jose's LI link is incorrect, so you'll have to correct it on the listing here, but it does exist.

The vision - not unique, but I like the idea of monetizing individual passions. I'm still, however, not convinced blockchain is at a stage yet where it can cater to gaming demands. And that's my primary concern with what you're trying to achieve. Apart from that, the core goals are definitely attainable.

The product is definitely being worked on. There's some ways to go, based on the MVP. WIll be interested to see how it comes together.


Token structures seem fine. The caps seem okay. I don't agree with the target market size being too small, I feel Asia is a great market to start with. It's an exceptionally gaming-friendly demographic, so you've got that spot on in my opinion.

Good luck! Looking forward to this one.

Avantages :
​

- Projet assez abouti avec une équipe nombreuse pour bien faire avancer le projet.

- Les joueurs auront pleins de moyens pour gagner de l'argent, quêtes, créations de contenus, tournois, etc...

- Très peu de token

- Certains jeux comme League of Legends sont connus pour avoir des joueurs qui sont toxiques et négatifs tout au long du jeu. Bountie met fin à ce problème en créant une plate-forme où la réputation de l'utilisateur est liée à ce qu'il gagne. En raison de ce système de réputation, il créera un environnement où tous les joueurs sont motivés en créant une expérience de jeu positive.

​
Inconvénients :
​

- Probablement un scam, l'annonce de partenariat avec MSI est fausse

- Ne se développe qu’en Asie.

- Nécessite que beaucoup de joueurs soient intéressés et surtout n’abandonnent pas Bountie au cours du temps.

- L’équipe n’a quasiment pas d’expérience dans le domaine des cryptomonnaies de la blockchain et surtout du gaming.

- La monnaie n'a pas forcement d'utilité, si ce n'est faire monnaie commune avec tous les pays d'Asie.

- Grosse compétition car beaucoup de projets de blockchain de gaming sont en cours ( AsuraCoin, CryptoHit, Quarters, etc..).

- Le but des gamers sera de vendre leurs token contre de l'argent réel, cela pourrait empêcher la montée du prix du token

Concept is one that's been missing in gaming as custom matches via peer to peer can be a hit. With tons of video game options, the options can be endless. Without mass adoption though, gaming projects can be doomed from the start.

Issues would then be mass adoption of games, gamers and industry specific partners. This would need to also be on a global scale. Team could use more industry specific advisors.

It seems that It is difficult to realize the idea without tens of thousands of existing players.

The team is the biggest red flag here. The founders and their key advisors, bar one have had no experience in the gaming industry before, and their advisors are more focused towards blockchain than the actual gaming problem they want to solve.

Aside from that, these paid to play programs have been tried many times before and so far none of them have really worked.

There is definitely space in blockchain for gaming to thrive, I just don't think this is one of them.

• Team is pretty good and legit
• Have office in Singapore
• Hardcap is pretty reasonable
• Vision is fine and make sense but there already exist many blockchain gaming platforms, so the compeitition will be fierce
• Have to work hard on tokenomics due to the high token velocity as I don't see any incentives for any parties to hodl the tokens
• Advisors are so-so