Experiment with humans who have degenerative diseases, but for that it is necessary to reach agreements with hospitals and renowned scientists who need these funds to complete their research.
Thanks to the Blockchain technology, we can collect those funds and have small investors exchange tokens for ours, which will then be used to verify that the address of the electronic.
Rated on Jan 30, 2019
Modified on Jan 30, 2019
→ Blockchain Advantage - ⛔️
→ White Paper - ⛔️
→ Team Composition - ✅
→ Token Economics - ⛔️
→ Business Model - ⛔️
→ Social Media Presence - ⛔️
→ Collaborations & partnerships - ⛔️
→ Fund Allocation - ⛔️
→ Legal Loopholes - ⛔️
→ MVP/ DApp/ Working Product - ⛔️
Advantage - The team is the only positive thing for this project!
Disadvantage - No clear blockchain advantage except fundraising via ICO and white paper needs quite an effort in improving. The business model is unclear so no apparent benefit for investors. The usage of tokens is unclear. The biggest concern is the huge disparity in soft cap and hard cap, with no reasons. A clear case of utility tokens without any utility.
Recommendation - This is a project suitable for VCs investing in basic life science rather than crowdfunding. Much effort has to be made to make it viable for any investor.
You can find my ratings methodology here- https://medium.com/@krishnenduchatterjee/ico-evaluation-investing-a-vc-perspective-for-investment-over-greedy-short-term-returns-433f6f9e13d8
Note - Pablo Cervera Roux comment -
"It is curious how well the project seemed when he offered his services for our company, he should not be upset if he was rejected and if he does not understand something about the project, it is better to ask us, we will try to improve.
I hope for its reputation that we do not find a way to extend human life, what a pity it is to find people who do not have a sincere opinion just for having been rejected, it is really sad."
1. It was Mr. Pablo Cervera Roux who contacted me for joining his team in the first place.
2. He mistook me for another person for majority of conversation.
3. Mr. Pablo didn't have the pleasure of rejecting me since I refused to raise any funds for commission basis only to begin with. So. I didn't offer to be part of the project or commented on "how well the project seemed" at any point.
4. Lastly, I gave my sincere opinion based on this Utopian concept's White paper.
Public Shaming isn't the first time I am facing, nor will it be the last. But I do hope you get your facts straight. I know how difficult it must be for you, Mr. Pablo Cervera Roux to do so, since you can't seem to even grasp people's name to begin with.
Please have a look at the Medium post for a detailed methodology and come back if you seem to have been unfairly treated.
Experts are independently and voluntarily contributing to the community. If no expert has rated the ICO, only ICO analyzer's results are used. Always research before investing as these ratings should not be taken as an investing guide of any kind.
Ratings and ICO analyzer results are being updated (re-calculated) every few hours.
TeamApply as an advisor
Partner and CEO
Sandra Miriam Vera
Partner & Sales manager
COO Director of operations
Director of human resources
Senior systems technician
Director of research and development
Web Designer Expert
Hter Token distribution to buyers
List on Exchange
Publication of agreements and relevant news
Annual report of the company