Ratings ARBITRAGING

First reviewed on 25 May 2019.

C1. I would like to invite the core team to provide the performance metrics for their system. Specifically, these performance metrics: standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, Jensen's alpha, beta, Sortino ratio, Omega, CPTCE, maximum drawdown, Information ratio, Treynor ratio, M2, T2, Stutzer index, Upside potential ratio, Calmar ratio, Clare ratio. An suitable excel worksheet can be downloaded here: http://www.performance-measurement.org (by Dr. Martin Sewell)

Requested time periods: 2018Q3, 2018Q4 and 2019Q1.

C2. There are several serious allegations that ARBITRAGING is a ponzi scheme. Among other reviews that attempted to demonstrate this, refer to this review by TMG: ""Arbitraging is a MASSIVE CRYPTO PONZI SCHEME! EXPOSED": https://youtu.be/-BO4bLDEXns
The speech-to-text for this video is available here: https://tinyurl.com/youtarb

C3. I would like to invite David and Majza to undergo the ICOBench KYC.

C4. I may revise my ratings after receiving further responses to above issues (by 30 May 2019)

--------

Updated review on 9 July 2019

C5. As there is zero input from the ARB team, I now revised my rating of ARB from 121 to 111.

--------

Updated review on 15 Oct 2019

C6. I was informed of an update on ARB by an existing ARB crypto token buyer (T). He shared with me an article titled "Plaintiff who invested retirement fund in token scheme promising doubled income in two months files suit, saying whole thing turned out to be a scam":
https://www.theblockcrypto.com/post/38090/plaintiff-who-invested-retirement-fund-in-token-scheme-promising-doubled-income-in-two-months-files-suit-saying-whole-thing-turned-out-to-be-a-scam

C7. I did a follow on search and found the case "Case 3:19-cv-05798-RBL", https://www.morrisoncohen.com/siteFiles/files/2019_08_29%20-%20Ferrie%20v_%20Woodford%20Research%20LLC,%20et%20al.pdf
Cache (pdf): http://tiny.cc/19arb